07 October 2022

'ಚೋಳ ಚೋಳ' / 'Chola Chola' Kannada Song Lyrics

'CHOLA CHOLA' KANNADA SONG LYRICS

This beautiful song perfectly captures the spirit of ancient India - a great civilisation built on strength and courage, and protected by brave warriors . . .

Lyrics: Ilango Krishnan (Tamil) / Jayant Kaikini (Kannada)
Singers: Ravi Basrur, Nakul Abhyankar
Music: A R Rahman
Movie: Ponniyin Selvan - 1

ಕುಣಿ ಕುಣಿ ಧ್ವಜ ಹಿಡಿದು
ಗಗನದಲ್ಲಿ ಪಟ ಪಟ ಪಟ ಬಡಿದು
ಕದನದಲ್ಲಿ ಹಟ ಹಟ ಹಟ ಮೆರೆದು
ಕುದುರೆಗಳು ಪುಟ ಪುಟ ಪುಟ ನೆಗೆದು

ವಿಜಯವಿದು ಕಾದಾಡು ಕಾದಾಡು
ಹೋರಾಡು ಹೋರಾಡು
ಮೊಳಗಲಿ ಹುಲಿಗಳೆ ವೀರಗರ್ಜನೆ
ಭುವನದಿ ಬೆರಗಿನ ಚೋಳ ವರ್ಣನೆ

ಹೆದರದು ಹುಲಿ ಎಲ್ಲಿದ್ದರೂ
ಏನೆಂದರೂ ಚೋಳ ಚೋಳ
ಅರಿಯದು ಹುಲಿ ಸೋಲೆಂದರೇ
ಏನೆಂಬುದಾ ಕೇಳಾ ಕೇಳಾ
ನಾಗಾಲೋಟ ಹೊಳೆದಿದೆ ಉರಿಗಣ್ಣಲ್ಲೇ
ವೀರಾವೇಶ ಖುರಪುಟಗಳ ದೂಳಿನಲ್ಲೇ

ಕುಣಿ ಕುಣಿ ಧ್ವಜ ಹಿಡಿದು . . .

ವಿಜಯವಿದು ಕಾದಾಡು ಕಾದಾಡು . . .

ಹನಿ ಮದಿರೆಗೆ ಓಲಾಡುತಾ
ತೇಲಾಡುತಾ ನನ್ನ ಲೋಕ
ಇಹ ಪರಗಳು ಒಂದಾಗಿರೇ
ಸಂಗಾತಿಯಾ ಆಸೆ ಬೇಕಾ

ಮಣ್ಣೀನ ಗುಣವೇ ಮಾತಾಡು
ಕಣ್ಣೀರ ಕ್ಷಣವೇ ಮಾತಾಡು
ಮತ್ತೇರೋ ಗುಟುಕೇ ಮಾತಾಡು
ಮುದ್ದಾದ ಮಾರಾಯ್ತಿ ಮಾತಾಡು

ಮಣ್ಣೀನ ಗುಣವೇ ಮಾತಾಡು . . .

ಲಲನೇ
ನನ್ನ ಕಾಯವು ಗಾಯವು ನೀನೇ

ಇದೊ ಇದೊ ತನುವಿನಲಿ
ಸಮರಗಳ ವಿಧ ವಿಧ ಹಳೆ ಕಲೆಯು
ಹೃದಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಬಿರಿ ಬಿರಿಯುವ ಉರಿಯು
ಕರೆಯುತಿದೆ ಕೊಡು

ಸೋಮರಸ ಗುಟುಕೇ ಸುರಿದು
ಇದೇ ಕಾಳಗವು ನೋಡಿನ್ನು
ಹಿಡೀ ಖಡ್ಗವನು ಸೆಳೆದು ಹಿರಿದು
ಸಿಡೀ ಮರೆಯದಿರು ಸೇಡನ್ನು

ಹನಿ ಮದಿರೆಗೆ ಓಲಾಡುತಾ . . .

ಕಂಡಿತ್ತೋ ಮಹಾನಾಡು ಕನಸಲಿ
ತುಂಬಿತ್ತೋ ಆಹಾ ಧೈರ್ಯ ಎದೆಯಲಿ
ಕುಂದಿತ್ತೋ ಅರಿ ಸೈನ್ಯ ಎದುರಿನಲಿ
ಕೆಂಪಿತ್ತೋ ಹೊಸಬಾನು ನಸುಕಲಿ
ಹಂಚಿತ್ತೋ ಸಮಾಚಾರ ಜಗದಲಿ
ಮಿಂಚಿತ್ತೋ ಸದಾ ಶೌರ್ಯ ಅಭಯದಲಿ

ಒಗ್ಗಟ್ಟಾಗಿಯೇ ಬದ್ಧರು ನಾವು
ಪ್ರಾಣಕ್ಕೂ ಸಹ ಸಿದ್ದರು ನಾವು
ಭೂಮಿ ಮೆಟ್ಟಿ ಬಾನ ತಟ್ಟಿ
ಬಾ ಗೆಲ್ಲುವ ತಲೆಯ ಎತ್ತಿ

ಕುಣಿ ಕುಣಿ ಧ್ವಜ ಹಿಡಿದು . . .

ವಿಜಯವಿದು ಕೊಡು
ಸೋಮರಸ ಗುಟುಕೇ ಸುರಿದು . . .

02 October 2022

'Ponniyin Selvan - 1': Movie Review

PONNIYIN SELVAN - 1: MOVIE REVIEW

The Chola Empire (900-1200) was one of India's biggest, richest and most powerful empires. In 1955, Tamil writer Ramaswamy Krishnamurthy (aka 'Kalki') wrote a novel called 'Ponniyin Selvan' ('Son of Kaveri') about the first Chola Emperor - Rajaraja I. Now Mani Ratnam brings the novel to the big screen.

Translating a novel with a complicated story, many characters and many plot-lines into a 3-hour movie is not easy - and it shows in the screenplay (by Mani Ratnam, Elango Kumaravel and B Jeyamohan). A voice-over narration with maps would have helped viewers to understand/appreciate the details of the story better - especially those (like me) who have neither read the book nor are experts on the Chola Empire. The biggest strengths of the movie are the technical departments. Costume designer Eka Lakhani and set designer Thota Tharani beautifully re-create the Chola Empire. Cameraman Ravi Varman and editor A Sreekar Prasad compensate for the weaknesses of the screenplay - especially in the war/battle scenes. A R Rahman's music is good. In the acting department, Vikram and Aishwarya Rai get the most complex/interesting characters and do justice to them - justifying their star billing.

If you love Indian history, PS-1 is a must-watch. Even if you don't, it is a good all-round entertainer . . .

20 September 2022

'Dark Knight Rises': The Pit - Meaning/Philosophy

DARK KNIGHT RISES: THE PIT - MEANING/PHILOSOPHY

In Dark Knight Rises (2012), Bruce Wayne is imprisoned by Bane in an underground prison - The Pit. There is a provision for the prisoners to escape from the prison by climbing out - with a rope tied to their waist for safety. In the entire history of the prison, not a single prisoner succeeds in climbing out. Every one of them falls during their climb - and the rope protects them from dying. Bruce Wayne also tries to escape in the same way - and meets the same fate. Finally he succeeds in escaping - by climbing out without the rope.

The rope seems to be a good thing - it keeps the prisoners from dying. But it is really a chain that keeps them inside the prison. Our life is full of such ropes. We hang on to them for safety. But they prevent us from escaping from our prisons. To become free, we must let go of the rope and climb out without it. But do we have the courage to do this?

06 August 2022

Atma Shakti Nirbhar Bharat

Atma Nirbhar Bharat means a self-reliant India. But the 21st century world is a globalised world. The production of almost all products has become a global process. So the only way for a country to create jobs is to become a part of the global production system. The problem with Atma-Nirbhar / self-reliance is that it suggests isolation - ie, cutting ourselves off from the world.

To benefit from the globalised economy, a country must participate in it by using its strengths to the fullest. The British economist David Ricardo proved this mathematically in his theory of comparative advantage in 1817 - more than 200 years ago. And this is what we have to do. That is, we must become Atma Shakti Nirbhar - an India that uses its strengths to participate fully in the global economy. We must become Atma Shakti Nirbhar Bharat - not simply 'Atma Nirbhar Bharat'.

05 August 2022

Have To Start Hating You

Fell in love with you
Wanted to marry you
But cannot marry you
Have to marry someone else

Have to start hating you
Have to get you out of my mind
Have to stop thinking about you
Have to fall out of love with you

Have to forget I loved you
Have to forget you even existed
Have to forget everything about you
Have to forget all my dreams with you

Have to fall in love with another girl
Somehow all over again
But every time I look at her face
I will only see your face

Realise how much I love you
Only when I can't get you
Earlier I couldn't see anything bad in you
Now I shouldn't see anything good in you

Everybody tells me
Listen to your head
And not to your heart
But my head and heart are one

Your face and your smile
Your voice and your laughter
Just fill my head completely
And simply refuse to leave me

My heart is yanked out of my chest
And been ripped into shreds
I have to somehow put it back in
And stitch my chest back together

My love for you then was deep
But my self-pity now is deeper
The only way to claw myself out of this cavern
Is to first reach its bottom

Have to start hating you . . .

This is what happens when a PhD student cannot do his thesis on his favourite subject - and has to do it on another subject.

31 July 2022

Economics: Microeconomics Vs Macroeconomics

MICROECONOMICS VS MACROECONOMICS

In the 1930s Great Depression, classical economics (today called 'microeconomics') failed because of a basic truth about the economic system: the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. In 1936, John Maynard Keynes wrote 'The General Theory Of Employment, Interest And Money' and invented a new way of looking at the economy (called 'macroeconomics') based on this basic truth. Macroeconomics was correct because it filled an important gap in economics: the gap between the whole and the sum of the parts. This point is important. That is, the purpose of macroeconomics is ONLY to fill this gap - ie, to explain those aspects of the (aggregate) economy that microeconomics cannot explain. The purpose of macroeconomics is NOT to explain ALL aspects of the (aggregate) economy - ie, macroeconomics is not a magic wand / silver bullet. The economy is fundamentally a bottom-up (not top-down) system - so microeconomics DOES explain most of the aspects of the economy.

This is a fundamental point in economics. It is the most fundamental point about the relationship between microeconomics and macroeconomics. But unfortunately no textbook says this clearly. Micro textbooks don't say this because they think that micro is anyway the 'real economics' - and assume that everybody also thinks like this. Macro textbooks don't say this because they do not want to highlight macro's deficiency. So there is a gap of silence between the two - which creates a gap in students' understanding. But understanding this point is essential to understanding economics.

Basic economics courses (BSc's first two years and MSc's first year) are structured like this:
1. Microeconomics - 50%
2. Macroeconomics - 50%
So everybody thinks:
Economics = 50% Microeconomics + 50% Macroeconomics
(See Figure 1)

Advanced economics courses (MSc's second year) consist of subjects like Trade Economics, Labour Economics, Industrial Economics, etc. But all these subjects are nothing but applied microeconomics. And the 'Microeconomics' subjects in the basic economics courses are actually microeconomic theory. So Figure 1 is wrong. And the correct equation of economics is:
Economics = 25% Microeconomic Theory + 25% Macroeconomics + 50% Applied Microeconomics
(See Figure 2)

So we must carry out two changes in our economics courses:
1. Rename the basic 'Microeconomics' subjects as 'Microeconomic Theory'
2. Explicitly identify the other subjects as 'Applied Microeconomics'
Then students will correctly understand the real structure of economics.

16 July 2022

Introvert, Extrovert, Generalist, Specialist

[I got this idea from FundraisingCoach.com]

Which is the best profession for us? The two most important factors are:
A. Our orientation towards people
B. Our orientation towards subjects

A. Our orientation towards people
There are two types of people based on this factor:
1. Introverts get their energy from themselves
2. Extroverts get their energy from other people

B. Our orientation towards subjects
There are two types of people based on this factor:
1. Generalists are interested in many subjects
2. Specialists are interested in only one subject

So considering these two factors together, there are totally 2 x 2 = 4 types of people:
1. Extrovert-Generalist
2. Introvert-Specialist
3. Extrovert-Specialist
4. Introvert-Generalist

The best professions for these people are:
1. Extrovert-Generalist - These people have a basic knowledge of many subjects and are good at working with people. So they make good managers.
2. Introvert-Specialist - These people have an in-depth knowledge of one subject and are good at working alone. So they make good researchers.
3. Extrovert-Specialist - These people have an in-depth knowledge of one subject and are good at working with people. So they make good experts.
4. Introvert-Generalist - These people do not have enough knowledge in any subject and are not good at working with people. So they are unemployable.

The rough percentages of these types of people are:
1. Extrovert-Generalist - 95%
2. Introvert-Specialist - 2%
3. Extrovert-Specialist - 2%
4. Introvert-Generalist - 1%

13 July 2022

Guru - The Giver Of Knowledge

GURU - THE GIVER OF KNOWLEDGE

Today is Guru Poornima - the day we worship our Gurus.

Who is a Guru? A teacher (shikshak) only gives information - but a Guru gives us knowledge. If we think knowledge is the same as information, we will never understand the meaning of Guru. Our ancestors understood the meaning of knowledge and its power - and hence the importance of Guru. So they built an education system (Guru Kula system) based on this understanding. That is why India was the greatest civilisation in the world for 4000 years.

The counter-part of Guru is shishya (disciple). A student (vidyarthi) only receives information; but a shishya discovers knowledge - with the blessings of his/her Guru. The requirement for a Guru is knowledge. Similarly the requirement for a shishya is faith - in his/her Guru. If our Guru tells us to walk through fire, we must do so. Not by thinking that we will get burnt - then it is not faith; it is slavery. Faith means knowing that we will be able to walk through the fire without getting burnt - because we have our Guru's blessings.

Today everybody says: "Now there are only teachers/shikshaks - and very few Gurus". True. But the other side of the coin is: Today there are only students - and very few shishyas. If we want to produce Gurus, first we must become shishyas. If we want Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, first we become Narendranath Datta. Only then we can become a nation of Swami Vivekanandas.

The 21st century is the knowledge century. So let us understand the meaning of knowledge and its power - and the importance of Guru. And let us remember the timeless wisdom of our ancestors:
guru brahma guru vishNu
guru devo maheshwara
guru sAkshAt parabrahma
tasmai shree gurave namah
 - Skanda Purana

03 July 2022

'The Changing World Order' - Ray Dalio (Review/Summary)

Review/Summary:

Ray Dalio is the 70th richest man in the world (worth $20 billion) and the founder of Bridgewater Associates - the biggest hedge fund in the world.

In his latest book 'The Changing World Order' (currently the #1 economics bestseller in America) he gives a model to explain the rise and fall of superpowers. According to him, there have been 3 superpowers (Holland, Britain, America) and now the 4th one (China) is rising. He says the rise and fall of superpowers is driven/caused by two major cycles: the economic cycle and the political cycle. He further divides the political cycle into two cycles: the internal political cycle and the external political cycle. And among these 3 cycles, the most important is the economic cycle. Dalio says the economic cycle is driven/caused by the debt/credit cycle. In fact, the book's cover has a diagram of the debt/credit theory of economic cycles. But this is a fringe theory in economics. So Dalio's model is based on a fringe theory - which puts a big question mark on his entire model. Interestingly, the book has been praised by many heavyweights like Bill Gates and Henry Kissinger - but by only one economist: Lawrence Summers. And coincidentally, Lawrence Summers is also the only major economist who supports the debt/credit theory of economic cycles.

Other criticisms:
# In a good detective novel, all the loose ends go on getting tied up and cleared away as we reach the end of the book. Dalio's book is the opposite - cracks start appearing in his model and go on adding up. So at the end, we have to take his model with a pinch of salt.
# Dalio's basic approach is to build a numerical model that takes the numeric values of various indicators and uses them to make predictions about the world. This is a very interesting exercise but the world is too complex a system to be modelled like this. What gets left out is much more (both in quality and quantity) than what can be captured in such a model.
# Dalio's model basically says that a country collapses as a superpower when its debt becomes too high. To prove his argument, he bombards us with a ton of graphs of very specialised economic indicators for the 4 superpowers - but the most important graphs are missing: the debt-to-GDP ratios.
# Throughout the book, Dalio keeps saying that America is declining because its debt is high and China is rising because its debt is low. But America's total debt (government + corporate + household) is 240% of its GDP and China's total debt is 250% of its GDP. At the end of the book, he says that he has constructed his own index to measure a country's debt burden. He should have revealed this in the beginning - when he describes his debt/credit theory of economic cycles.
# Dalio wrongly uses many basic economics terms. Example: 'Devaluation' means a country reducing the value of its currency against other currencies. But he uses the word to mean a currency losing its value against gold. This is nothing but an increase in the price of gold - which anyway happens due to inflation. So he keeps saying 'devaluation' when it is actually inflation.
# Dalio talks about the 'real economy' and the 'financial economy' - as if they are two systems, equal in size and importance. This is wrong - the financial system is nothing but a sub-system of the economic system.
# People who have studied economics can read this book to test their understanding of the subject. People who have not studied economics are better off reading a good economics textbook instead.
# The book has no index or bibliography.

However Dalio does get a couple of points right:
# Importance of education - Dalio identifies 8 factors that make a country a superpower: 1) Education 2) Technology 3) Competitiveness 4) Military 5) Trade 6) GDP 7) Financial centre 8) Reserve currency. These are in chronological cause-effect order: ie, 1 leads to 2, 2 leads to 3, and so on. That is - he (correctly) identifies education as the most fundamental factor that makes a country strong. This is especially relevant for India because our education system (especially our primary education system) is very weak.
# Importance of fiscal discipline - During normal times, a country can have a high debt/deficit and nothing will happen. But normal times do not last forever - sooner or later, a shock will come. In the last two years alone, the world has had two major shocks: Covid-19 and the Ukraine War. And when a shock comes, countries with a low debt/deficit survive but countries with a high debt/deficit collapse. Hence fiscal discipline (ie, a country spending less than what it earns) is of paramount importance.

02 July 2022

I Am Nupur Sharma

Today a friend warned me about my Facebook post saying #IsupportNupurSharma. Let us look at this whole situation:

1. Hinduism respects all religions. This is the most fundamental feature of Hinduism.
2. The practical consequence of the above point is: For Hindus, not offending others is more important than telling the truth. That is - Hindus do not tell the truth if it will offend others.
# Feature #1 is great. Feature #2 is bad - but it is also a fundamental characteristic of Hindus.
# Nupur Sharma only stated a fact. In fact, she just quoted from Islam's own scripture. But in doing so, she violated rule/feature #2 of Hindus. But she did so when she lost her temper because Islamic fundamentalists were continuously abusing Lord Shiva in that debate.
# She later apologised unconditionally for what she said. Her party also punished her by firing her from her job and suspending her from the party.
# So the matter must have ended there. But next Islamic fundamentalists started threatening to rape and kill her - and liberals were tacitly supporting these threats.
# A Hindu called Kanhaiya Lal posted in support of her - and two Islamic fundamentalists killed him.
# A Supreme Court Judge says Nupur Sharma is responsible for Kanhaiya Lal's murder.

What does all this mean? Cannot we live and speak freely in our own country? Should we live in fear that somebody will kill us just because we stated a fact - or supported someone who stated a fact? If so, then what is the point of being alive?

So I no longer 'support' Nupur Sharma - now I am Nupur Sharma.

#IamNupurSharma

05 June 2022

Adam Smith, 'Wealth Of Nations', Free-Market Capitalism

ADAM SMITH, 'WEALTH OF NATIONS', FREE-MARKET CAPITALISM

Today is the 299th birth anniversary of the greatest thinker of all time - Adam Smith.

In the 1700s the science of economics (ie, the scientific study of the economy) was not yet born. But there was no shortage of schools of thought on the economy. The most dominant school of thought was mercantilism - which had two main beliefs:
1. A country's wealth is its gold/silver.
2. Exports are good and imports are bad.

Adam Smith was a professor of philosophy at Glasgow University in Scotland. His logical mind realised that mercantilism was wrong.  So he decided to write a book to disprove mercantilism. The result was 'Wealth Of Nations' in 1776. In it, he logically proved that:
1. A country's wealth is its farms and factories.
2. Exports and imports are two sides of the same coin.
But 'Wealth Of Nations' did not stop there. It was much more ambitious in scope. It went on to logically prove that the best economic system is the free, natural, efficient economic system. Later this economic system would come to be called as 'capitalism'.

'Wealth Of Nations' soon became popular and brought an end to mercantilism. But its real mission was just about to begin. In 1848, a German philosopher called Karl Marx wrote a book called 'Communist Manifesto' in which he designed a government-controlled economic system called 'socialism'. Socialism soon became the official economic ideology of the Communists. In 1917, Communists seized power in Russia, turned it into 'Soviet Union' and imposed socialism. When World War 2 ended in 1945, Soviet Union got control over East Europe and imposed socialism there. In 1947, India became free and its first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru imposed socialism. In 1949, Communists seized power in China and imposed socialism. Half the world was under socialism.

Countries that were lucky to adopt capitalism (like East Asia and South East Asia) grew fast and lifted their people out of poverty. Countries that were unlucky to adopt socialism grew slowly and struggled to lift their people out of poverty. In 1978, China changed its economic system from socialism to capitalism. In 1991, Soviet Union collapsed and broke up into 15 countries - which adopted capitalism. East Europe became free and adopted capitalism. Also in 1991, India started changing its economic system from socialism to capitalism under Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao.

From 1917 to 1991, that is for three-quarters of a century, half of mankind fell under the evil of socialism - and remained in poverty. India is still fighting the war against the evil of socialism - and trying to come out of poverty. Adam Smith logically proved almost 250 years ago how the free, natural, efficient economic system (capitalism) is the best economic system. May his wisdom always be with us . . .

01 June 2022

Congress Mukt Bharat

Today is a historic day - it marks the Congress Party's longest time out of power at the Centre. The previous record was 1996-2004.

17 May 1996 to 21 May 2004 = 2,927 days
27 May 2014 to 1 June 2022 = 2,928 days

We have been a free country for 75 years. In that time, Congress Party has been out of power continuously at the Centre for a maximum of 8 years. Today that record is being broken.

One more step towards Congress Mukt Bharat . . .

15 May 2022

Inflation And The 2014 National Election

Q: Why was the Congress Party reduced to 45 seats in the 2014 national election?
A: Because inflation in the last two years of the UPA-2 government was almost 10%.

[Note: CPI inflation was measured only from 2012 onwards - till then only WPI inflation was measured]

In 2008, WPI inflation started increasing (due to high oil price). In 2009, it dropped due to the global recession caused by the 2008 American Financial Crisis (AFC). But the drop was temporary - it started increasing again and averaged 9.5% in 2010-2011. The RBI increased the repo rate gradually from 4.75% to 8.5% during this period. But throughout these two years, the repo rate remained below the WPI inflation - and hence the real interest rate remained negative during these two years. From 2012 onwards, we have the CPI inflation - which is a better measure of the inflation that people/consumers actually face (as compared to WPI which is faced by the firms/industries). CPI inflation started off in 2012 January at an already high value of 7.65% and went on to increase further. By the time the national election came in 2014 April, it averaged 9.7% over 27 months. This means a price increase of 23% in just over 2 years - which is massive. For the middle class, inflation is an irritation. For poor people (who are the majority in India) it is more than an irritation: those who eat 3 meals a day have to eat 2 meals a day and those who eat 2 meals a day have to eat 1 meal a day. Therefore poor people overwhelmingly voted against the Congress Party in the national election and reduced it to 45 seats.

Why was the RBI not more aggressive in increasing the repo rate to control inflation? Answer: In the context of the 2009 global recession, the UPA-2 government wanted to keep the Indian economy's growth rate high - which meant not increasing the interest rate too much.

Cut to today. WPI inflation increased rapidly in the first half of 2021 from 2.5% to 13%. Now it is at 14.5%. CPI inflation was below 6% (the upper limit of the RBI's target) till 2022 January. But as happened exactly 10 years ago, the high WPI has started pulling up the CPI. As a result, CPI inflation is now at 7.8%.

And what has been the RBI's response? While the WPI inflation averaged around 13% from mid-2021 onwards, it kept the repo rate at just 4%. This was to increase the growth rate of the Indian economy which was devastated by the Covid-19 crisis. Sounds familiar? Yes - this was exactly the thinking of the UPA-2 government in 2010-2011. And we know what happened next.

Moral of the story: If the Prime Minister wants the BJP to avoid the Congress Party's 2014 fate, he must tell the Finance Minister and the RBI Governor only one thing: "Screw growth - just focus on reducing inflation".

Addendum: Before 2012, CPI was measured only for industrial workers (CPI-IW). CPI-IW roughly follows CPI. The average CPI-IW inflation for the UPA-2 period was 10.3% - ie, a price increase of 60% over 5 years. It reached a peak of 16% in 2010 January. By the way:
1. Average CPI-IW inflation for the 5 years of UPA-1 was 6.1%.
2. Average CPI inflation for the 5 years of Modi-1 was 4.35%.



25 April 2022

Government Economic Policies: Good Vs Bad

Good vs bad economic policies:
Government Policies
BAD
GOOD
Role in economy
Own and run companies
(Socialism)
Make and enforce rules
(Capitalism)
Spend on
Subsidies
Loan waivers
Welfare schemes
(Populism)
Infrastructure
Education
Healthcare
(Development)
Trade policy
High import tax
(Anti-trade)
Low import tax
(Pro-trade)

27 February 2022

2008 American Financial Crisis (AFC) - 2

Today is the 15th anniversary of the beginning of the 2008 American Financial Crisis (AFC).

The seller of a product/service knows more about it than the buyer. This is called information asymmetry. Information asymmetry leads to the collapse of the market. So to protect buyers from information symmetry (and the market from collapse) government makes some rules and enforces them. This is called regulation. In the case of complex financial products/services, even the sellers (financial companies) do not know anything about them. This is not just information asymmetry - this is information black-hole. In the case of information black-hole, government regulation is absolutely essential.

From around 1980 onwards, America's financial industry started designing more and more complex financial products/services like CDS (Credit Default Swap) and CDO (Collateralised Debt Obligation). This required stricter government regulation. But exactly the opposite happened - in a wave of excessive de-regulation, government regulation went on decreasing. Example: The 1933 Glass-Steagall Act had built a wall between commercial banking and investment banking - in 1999, America withdrew this law. The result of all this excessive de-regulation was the 2008 American Financial Crisis.

25 December 2021

Which Is The Best Course?

 WHICH IS THE BEST COURSE?

"Which course must I do?" is the most basic question for youngsters (age 15-21/22). There are 3 major decision-points in education:
1. After 10th std
2. After 12th std
3. After degree

The basic question is: Which is your favourite subject? And the rule is: If your favourite subject is X, then take subject X in the next stage. Example: If your favourite subject in school is history, then do Arts in +2. What if you don't have any favourite subject*? Then take the Best Default Option at that stage. The Best Default Options at each stage are:
1. After 10th std - Science
2. After 12th std - Engineering
3. After degree - MBA

The Best Default Option is the option that will:
A. Guarantee you a decent-paying job
B. Give you the freedom/flexibility to change your path later

In 20th century India, the top 1% took medicine and the bottom 99% took engineering. In 21st century India, almost every field will pay you enough to live a middle class lifestyle (car + house + children's school fees). So youngsters must focus on discovering their potential and achieving their potential. The above education 'algorithm' may help them to do that.

*PS: If you have a hobby you are passionate about (sports, music, art, etc) you can make that your career.

20 December 2021

2021 People Of The Year: Healthcare Workers

# For fighting a heroic war against the Chinese virus

# For saving the lives of around 2.5 lakh people

# For putting their duty above themselves and their families

# For proving the ancient saying 'Vaidyo Narayano Hari'

Healthcare workers (doctors + nurses) are 2021's People Of The Year . . .

15 October 2021

Hinduism And Hindutva

HINDUISM AND HINDUTVA

Q: What makes humans different from animals?
A: Culture.
Every group of humans have a system of beliefs and practices - ie, a culture. This culture makes us human. Without it, we are no better than animals.

We are Hindus. Our way of life is Hinduism. This way of life has sustained our civilisation for 5000 years. If we lose our way of life, we will be no better than animals. Islamic/Christian fundamentalism have been waging war on Hinduism for 1000 years and have been trying to destroy it. This war continues even today.

Today is Vijay Dashami - the day Goddess Durga killed Mahishasura. It is the victory of Dharma over Adharma, of good over evil. On this sacred occasion, let us vow to fight for Hinduism and against anti-Hinduism in our own humble way. Let us preserve our 5000-year-old way of life - and remain humans.

Sanatana Hindu Dharma ki jai!

01 August 2021

Why Mistakes Are Necessary

What is a 'mistake'? You are at point A. You want to go to point B. You think action X will take you to point B - so you do action X. But after doing action X, you end up at point C. Then you analyse the whole process (of you doing action X and going from point A to point C). Based on your analysis, you now think that you should have done another action Y to go to point B. Then you say that action X was a 'mistake'.

When you were at point A, you had a certain amount of information. Based on that information, you decided that action X would take you to point B. Now - after doing action X and going from point A to point C, your information has increased. So now based on this increased information, you are saying that you should have done action Y instead of action X. Did you have this information when you were at point A? No.

You will say: "I should have collected more information when I was at point A". The truth is you collected as much information as you could when you were at point A. There is a limit to how much knowledge we can acquire through mere data-collection - and you had reached that limit at point A. The only way to acquire more knowledge is through experience - ie, doing action X and going from point A to point C.

Another way of understanding this is to ask the question: "In what scenarios will we never make a 'mistake'?". Answer:
1. When we have complete information/knowledge - This is impossible because we are humans, not Gods.
2. When we don't try to go from point A to point B at all - ie, When we don't try anything at all.

Seen this way, we realise that mistakes are the only way for us to reach our goals. That is - mistakes are necessary.

26 July 2021

B S Yadiyurappa - The Economic Reformer

The 1991 economic reforms were a revolution in India's history. They freed our economy by removing government-controls on production and trade. But government-controls remained on the three inputs/factors of production  land, labour and capital. So our economy became only 50% free. Making our economy 100% free and unleashing its full potential requires removing these government-controls also  ie, carrying out factor-market reforms. Economists call this as Second Generation Reforms  and have been demanding it since 1991.

In 2015, Prime Minister Narendra Modi tried to carry out land-reforms  ie, removing government-controls on selling and buying land. Congress Party (which wants the pre-1991 govt-controlled socialism) said the land-reforms were 'pro-rich' and 'anti-poor'. Rahul Gandhi famously said: "Aapki sarkar suit-boot ki sarkar hai". The Modi-government was afraid of being seen as pro-rich/anti-poor  so it dropped the land-reforms and said it would leave it to the states. And how many state-governments (including BJP state-governments) carried out the land-reforms? Answer: Zero.

In 2019, BJP came to power in Karnataka and B S Yadiyurappa became Chief Minister. In January 2020, he attended the World Economic Forum at Davos and then announced that he would carry out the land-reforms in Karnataka. In September, he pushed the Land Reforms Bill through both the Houses of the Karnataka Legislature and carried out the land-reforms. Now (10 months later) the first benefits of the land-reforms are already visible: land prices, land sales and government revenue have all increased.

Today B S Yadiyurappa resigned as Chief Minister of Karnataka and brought an end to his long political career. He will go down in history not just as the man who brought BJP to power in South India but also as the greatest economic reformer among India's Chief Ministers.

24 July 2021

India's 1991 Revolution

Today is the 30th anniversary of India's 1991 economic reforms. When we became free in 1947, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru adopted the inefficient govt-controlled socialism as our economic system. After him, his daughter Indira Gandhi also continued with the same inefficient economic system. As a result, our GDP grew by around 3.5% per year. Our population grew by around 2% per year  so our per capita income grew only by around 1.5% per year.

But the countries of East Asia and South East Asia adopted the efficient free-market capitalism as their economic system. As a result, their GDPs grew by up to 10% per year. Consequently, the East Asian countries (Japan, Korea, Taiwan) became high-income countries and the South East Asian countries (Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc) became middle-income countries whereas we remained a low-income country  though they were poorer than us in 1947.

Finally in 1991, Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao started the process of changing our economic system from inefficient govt-controlled socialism to efficient free-market capitalism. As a result:
# Our GDP has grown by around 8% per year. Our population has grown by around 1.5% per year  so our per capita income has grown by around 6.5% per year.
# We have lifted around 60 crore people out of poverty  drastically reducing our poverty from around 50% in 1991 to around 5% today.
# Our economy has grown more than 10 times from $ 270 billion (#17 in the world) in 1991 to $ 3 trillion (#5 in the world) today.

Today's youngsters have not seen pre-1991 socialist India  so they do not know how revolutionary the 1991 economic reforms were. We can understand this revolution by looking at the lifestyle of a middle-class family in pre-1991 socialist India:
# Only a few middle-class families had cars  most had only scooters.
# Only doctors got telephones immediately  other middle-class families had to be in a waiting-list.
# There was only one TV channel for the whole country  the government channel (Door Darshan).

Thus the 1991 economic reforms brought about sweeping and unimaginable changes in India. So we must call the event by its correct name: not 'reforms'  but 'revolution'. But the process is still incomplete. Our economy is still 50% socialist. We must take the 1991 Revolution to its logical conclusion by making our economy 100% capitalist  to lift all our people out of poverty and make India a superpower.

15 April 2021

Online Classes Is NOT Education

ONLINE CLASSES IS NOT EDUCATION

# Sitting in a real classroom with your classmates and discussing the subjects with your Professors is education.
# Living in a hostel with your batchmates + seniors + juniors and interacting with them is education.
# Eating in a mess with your batchmates + seniors + juniors and complaining about the bad food is education.
# Seeing your classmates, talking to them, cracking jokes with them and laughing with them is education.

# Sitting in front of a laptop at your home in your home-town is NOT education.

09 April 2021

India, Hinduism, Conservatism & Liberalism

INDIA, HINDUISM, CONSERVATISM & LIBERALISM

Conservatism says order is more important than freedom. Liberalism says freedom is more important than order. The genius of Indian/Hindu civilisation is that it has always aimed at a perfect balance between both order and freedom. Thus Hinduism is both conservative and liberal. But if we are forced to choose between order and freedom, which should we choose? The Second Law of Thermodynamics gives us the answer to this question. It says that a system's entropy (disorder) always tends to increase. That is: the natural tendency is for a system's disorder to increase – and order to decrease. In other words: in the tug-of-war between order and freedom, freedom has the natural advantage – and order has the natural disadvantage. So if we are forced to choose between order and freedom, we must always choose order. If we err on the side of too much order (and too little freedom) that error is reversible – because the natural tendency of the universe will correct this error. But if we err on the side of too much freedom (and too little order) that error is irreversible – because the natural tendency of the universe will magnify this error. In other words: freedom lost can always be regained – but order lost is lost forever.

24 March 2021

India And Freedom/Democracy/Human-Rights Index

Every international freedom/democracy/human-rights 'index' is reducing India's rank/score every year. They are using the formula:
-X = X0/Y
Where:
-X = Reduction in India's score this year
X0 = India's score last year
Y = Number of years they expect the Modi/BJP/NDA government to last

So India's score will go on decreasing every year and reach zero in the (estimated) last year of the Modi/BJP/NDA government.
Also we can use this formula to find out the value of Y for the authors/creators of each such 'index'.

07 March 2021

Karl Marx, Levi Strauss, Blue Jeans And Capitalism

Karl Marx was from a Jewish family whose surname was Levi. His father converted to Christianity and changed the surname to 'Marx'. Meanwhile another Jew called Levi Strauss started making and selling blue jeans in America. This blue jeans went on to become the biggest symbol not just of America  but also of its economic system: ie, free-market capitalism. So when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 and free-market capitalism triumphed over Karl Marx's socialism, it was also the triumph of one Levi (who did not change his name and religion) over another Levi (who changed his name and religion).

20 February 2021

Modi, BJP And Free-Market Capitalism

MODI, B.J.P AND FREE-MARKET CAPITALISM

February 10 was a historic day for India. For the first time, a Prime Minister praised the private-sector and wealth-creators on the floor of the Parliament. Since 1947, our country (especially our political system) has been suffering from an evil called socialism. This evil kept us poor for half a century  while the poorer countries of East Asia and South East Asia became rich with free-market capitalism. In 1991, Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao started destroying this evil. But almost 3 decades later, this evil is still very powerful in our country – the rich farmers' protest is a perfect example of this. Even the 'right-wing' political party BJP has been suffering from this evil. That is why the February 10 speech is so important. Yes  the Prime Minister did not go far enough to use the term 'mukt-bazar punjivad' (free-market capitalism). But socialism being our second national religion (after Hinduism) even the words 'private-sector' and 'wealth-creators' are revolutionary enough. Let us hope the Prime Minister, the government and the BJP embrace free-market capitalism completely. And let us support them 100% in this regard. Bharat Mata ki jai.

17 January 2021

America, Conservatism And Republican Party

Till the 1960s, race was not a factor at all in American politics. A) The country was 90% white and B) the non-whites were mainly blacks – who were not allowed to vote. But then two developments happened in quick succession that caused a tectonic shift in American society – and brought race to the centre of American politics. First, America passed the Civil Rights Act in 1964 – allowing blacks to vote. Second, immigration from Mexico exploded from 1970 onwards – leading to a huge influx of Latinos/Hispanics. As a result, today whites are only 60% of the country – and non-whites are 40%. Inevitably, race became the central factor of American politics.

Specifically, these two developments led to a crystallisation of the two political parties. The liberal Democratic Party made racial equality/justice its #1 agenda/ideology – and got a solid vote-bank of 30% (13% blacks + 17% Latinos/Hispanics). Now conservatives and liberals are evenly matched in America. But this support of the racial minorities gave the Democratic Party a huge advantage. How could the conservative Republican Party even compete against a vote-bank like this? Republican leaders like Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan came up with the answer: ally with white racists and Christian fundamentalists. The strategy was successful – from 1968 to 2016, the Republican Party won 8 out of 13 Presidential elections.

So far, so good. But there is a fundamental contradiction between conservatism/nationalism and white racism / Christian fundamentalism. Thus there was a fundamental contradiction in the alliance of the Republican Party. So how did this contradictory alliance not merely survive but also succeed for almost half a century? Winning elections in an industrialised democracy requires mainly 3 things: organisation machinery, money and media. The conservative leaders and strategists of the Republican Party (like their counterparts in the Democratic Party) controlled all these 3 things. Whereas the white racists / Christian fundamentalists are mostly middle-class and lower-class people – who only have numbers, but not control over these 3 things.

Enter the 21st century – with its cocktail of Internet, 24-hour news/media and reality TV. This cocktail revolutionised the world by democratising it. But for the Republican Party, it threatened its contradictory alliance. Because now a white racist / Christian fundamentalist leader could use this cocktail to by-pass conservative leaders/strategists, directly reach out to the large number of white racist / Christian fundamentalist voters – and use their numbers to take over the Republican Party. And that is exactly what happened in 2016. Donald Trump (a real-estate tycoon and reality TV star) threw conservatism into the dustbin, openly embraced white racism / Christian fundamentalism, reached out openly to white racist / Christian fundamentalist voters and became the Republican Party's Presidential candidate – and then America's President.

This is the tragedy of American conservatism and the Republican Party – getting undone by the country's racial demography.

12 January 2021

Agriculture Reforms, Farmers Protest And Supreme Court

AGRICULTURE REFORMS, FARMERS PROTEST AND SUPREME COURT

Legislature's job is making the rules, executive's job is enforcing the rules (made by the legislature) and judiciary's job is interpreting the rules (made by the legislature and enforced by the executive). This is the Fundamental Law Of Democracy. The Supreme Court can strike down a law made by the Parliament ONLY if it violates the Constitution - NOT because a mob of rich farmers has been strangulating the national capital for 50 days. By suspending 3 laws passed by the Parliament (which is elected by the people of India) the Supreme Court violated the Fundamental Law Of Democracy - and turned India into a mobocracy + judicial dictatorship. Today was a black day for India . . .

25 December 2020

2020 Men Of The Year: Galwan Valley Martyrs

# For making the ultimate sacrifice for the Motherland

# For defending the Motherland till their last breath

# For their fearlessness in the face of an evil enemy

# For reminding us that our freedom is not free

The 20 martyrs of the Galwan Valley Battle are 2020's Men Of The Year . . .

01 November 2020

Mistakes Are Good

Everybody says "Make mistakes - but don't repeat your mistakes". This advice is well-intentioned, but it is wrong - both logically and practically:
1. Logically - There is no need to say "Don't repeat your mistakes". Who repeats their mistakes? Nobody does - because the human brain is built and programmed to learn from its mistakes. And in case somebody 'repeats' his/her mistake, it only means that the original learning was not enough - because the original mistake was not big enough; so a 'repetition' is needed.
2. Practically - If we keep saying "Don't repeat your mistakes", then people make it as their rule #1. And what is the best way to avoid repeating mistakes? Simple: Don't make any mistakes at all - ie, play safe and don't take any risks. So "Don't repeat your mistakes" practically becomes "Don't make any mistakes".

So instead of saying the well-intentioned but completely wrong "Make mistakes - but don't repeat your mistakes", we should simply say "Mistakes are good".

14 September 2020

Obsolete Managers: Flat Vs Hierarchical Organisation

Let:
N = Number of levels in an organisation
a = Entry-level age (years)
A = Retirement age (years)
T = Number of years (on average) to move from one level to the next level
Then T = (A - a)/N
Usually a = 25 and A = 60. So T = 35/N. More generally, T is inversely proportional to N.

Let P(Obs) = Probability of the managers' knowledge about the core-work becoming obsolete. Then P(Obs) is proportional to T. So P(Obs) is inversely proportional to N. In a flat organisation, N is low - so P(Obs) is high. In a hierarchical organisation, N is high - so P(Obs) is low. The conventional view is that a flat organisation is good and a hierarchical organisation is bad. But from the point-of-view of the managers becoming obsolete, hierarchical organisations are superior to flat organisations.

11 September 2020

Why Managers Are Obsolete

WHY MANAGERS ARE OBSOLETE

An organisation is like a pyramid:
1. It consists of different levels.
2. People at different levels do different types of work.
Specifically:
3. The people at the bottom do the core-work of the organisation.
4. The job of the people at the top is to help/support the bottom-people.
The top-people have moved to the top from the bottom. That is: earlier they were at the bottom – and were doing the core-work of the organisation.

In a static/unchanging world, this model would be perfect:
1. People start at the bottom doing the core-work.
2. As time passes, they move up to the top-levels.
3. They have experience/knowledge about the core-work.
4. With this experience/knowledge, they help/support the bottom-people.
But the problem is the 21st century world is not a static/unchanging world – it is a dynamic/fast-changing world. And how we do a work is a function of the world/environment. So when the environment changes, how we do a work also changes.

Thus some time after the bottom-people move to the top (and become top-people), the technology/environment changes – and the top-people's knowledge/experience about the core-work becomes obsolete. They know about doing the core-work when the technology/environment was in its previous state. But they do not know anything about doing the core-work NOW – when the technology/environment is in a completely new state. But still, they keep giving orders to the bottom-people – who actually know how to do the core-work NOW (with the technology/environment in its current state).

Therefore managers (top-people) are inherently obsolete. And the traditional management model / organisation structure is also inherently obsolete.

01 September 2020

Laws Of System Complexity, Output Quality, Environment Dynamism And Operating Intelligence

LAWS OF SYSTEMS

1. Law of system complexity and operating intelligence:
The intelligence required to run a system is proportional to the system's complexity.

2. Law of system complexity and output quality:
For a given level of intelligence of the people running a system, the quality of the system's output is inversely proportional to the system's complexity.

3. Law of environment dynamism and operating intelligence:
The intelligence required to run a system is proportional to the dynamism of the system's environment.

4. Law of environment dynamism and output quality:
For a given level of intelligence of the people running a system, the quality of the system's output is inversely proportional to the dynamism of the system's environment.

Pranab Mukherjee: The Last Liberal

Which was the defining point of Pranab Mukherjee's long and illustrious political career?
A. 31 Oct 1984 – Congress Party made Rajiv Gandhi as Prime Minister, pushing aside its senior-most leader Pranab-ji
B. 22 May 2004 – Sonia Gandhi made Manmohan Singh as Prime Minister, pushing aside their senior-most leader Pranab-ji
C. 25 Jul 2012 – Pranab-ji became the 13th President of India, the highest office of our Republic
D. 7 Jun 2018 – Pranab-ji attended the valedictory function of RSS's training camp at its Nagpur headquarters
Cynics will say A and B. Most people will say C. But for me, it was D.

Liberals see and treat the RSS as an untouchable Hindu fascist organisation. Yet Pranab Mukherjee, who had occupied the highest office of our Republic and was fully aware of its sanctity, attended the RSS's most important annual event as its Chief Guest. Why? Because he knew that in a society, people will have different viewpoints and the only way to run a society is to be open-minded and try to understand other viewpoints. In that sense, he was a true liberal – an open-minded man who engaged constructively with people he disagreed with. In fact, he was India's last liberal – and the people who call themselves liberals can definitely learn a thing or two from him.

A great son of Mother India has left us. May God give strength to his family . . .

30 August 2020

Congress Party And JEE/NEET Exams

Last month, 20+ senior leaders of the Congress Party wrote a detailed letter to Sonia Gandhi demanding a complete revamp of the party – which would end the Nehru dynasty's control of the party. This Monday, the Congress Working Committee held its meeting to discuss the letter. Sonia Gandhi started the meeting by asking the CWC to relieve her of her responsibilities. Immediately, loyalists of the Dynasty denounced the letter and declared their loyalty to the Dynasty. The dissenters were outnumbered and the CWC passed a resolution condemning the letter and praising the Dynasty.

When the letter was written, most of the pro-Congress English media rightly saw it as a possible beginning of the Congress Party's revival – and enthusiastically supported the letter. And when the Congress Working Committee torpedoed the initiative, they were furious and produced a flood of reports and analyses criticising the Dynasty. So this week has been full of negative headlines for the Dynasty. This was unacceptable to Sonia Gandhi – and she had to do something to stop this.

But how? Simple: The JEE/NEET exams are starting on September 1. So she called a meeting of all the Congress Chief Ministers and ordered them to oppose the exams. She also ordered the Congress Party to carry out protests all over the country against the exams. Result: Now everybody has forgotten about the rebellious letter and the CWC meeting farce – so her plan has succeeded brilliantly.

Moral of the story: Modi-Shah may be 'Chanakya' – but they have ruled the country for only 6 years. Remember that Sonia Gandhi ruled the country for 10 years . . .

04 August 2020

India's Cities And City-Governments

INDIA'S CITIES AND CITY-GOVERNMENTS

In the 21st century, the most important socio-economic unit of a country is the city. Cities are the centres of wealth-creation and job-creation. So an efficient political system must be based on this fundamental reality. That means a city-based political system - in which city-governments have all the powers necessary to manage their cities efficiently. But currently we have a feudal/medieval political system - in which city-governments are under the control of the state-government. And the inefficiency of this system has been completely exposed by the ongoing Covid-19 crisis.

Every city has its own resources and capabilities on the one hand - and its own problems and challenges on the other hand. So cities must use their resources and capabilities to deal with their problems and challenges. City-governments can do this if:
1. They have full powers
2. They are directly elected by the city's people
3. They are answerable to the city's people.
They cannot do this if:
1. They have limited powers
2. They are indirectly elected by the city's people
3. They are not answerable to the city's people
Which is the case now.

Fully empowered city-governments will manage our cities efficiently, create jobs and remove poverty. As long as we continue with our current 2-level government system (centre + states) we will remain a third world country. To become a superpower, we must change to a 3-level government system (centre + states + cities).

22 July 2020

Economic System: Efficiency And Equality

A good economic system has two features: efficiency and equality. How to achieve this?

From Hal Varian's 'Microeconomics' (2010):


The Second Theorem of Welfare Economics asserts that under certain conditions, every Pareto efficient allocation can be achieved as a competitive equilibrium.

What is the meaning of this result? The Second Welfare Theorem implies that the problems of distribution and efficiency can be separated. Whatever Pareto efficient allocation you want can be supported by the market mechanism. The market mechanism is distributionally neutral. Whatever your criteria for a good or a just distribution of welfare, you can use competitive markets to achieve it.

Prices play two roles in the market system: an allocative role and a distributive role. The allocative role of prices is to indicate relative scarcity; the distributive role is to determine how much of different goods different agents can purchase. The Second Welfare Theorem says that these two roles can be separated: we can redistribute endowments of goods to determine how much wealth agents have, and then use prices to indicate relative scarcity.

Policy discussions often become confused on this point. One often hears arguments for intervening in pricing decisions on grounds of distributional equity. However, such intervention is typically misguided. As we have seen above, a convenient way to achieve efficient allocations is for each agent to face the true social costs of his/her actions and to make choices that reflect those costs. Thus in a perfectly competitive market, the marginal decision of whether to consume more or less of some good will depend on the price – which measures how everyone else values this good on the margin. The considerations of efficiency are inherently marginal decisions – each person should face the correct marginal tradeoff in making his/her consumption decisions.

The decision about how much different agents should consume is a totally different issue. In a competitive market, this is determined by the value of the resources that a person has to sell. From the viewpoint of the pure theory, there is no reason why the state can't transfer purchasing power (endowments) among consumers in any way that is seen fit. But the message of the Second Welfare Theorem is important. Prices should be used to reflect scarcity. Lump-sum transfers of wealth should be used to adjust for distributional goals. To a large degree, these two policy decisions can be separated.

People's concern about the distribution of welfare can lead them to advocate various forms of manipulation of prices. It has been argued, for example, that senior citizens should have access to less expensive telephone service, or that small users of electricity should pay lower rates than large users. These are basically attempts to redistribute income through the price system by offering some people lower prices than others. When you think about it, this is a terribly inefficient way to redistribute income. If you want to redistribute income, why don't you simply redistribute income? If you give a person an extra dollar to spend, then he can choose to consume more of any of the goods that he wants to consume – not necessarily just the good being subsidised.

13 July 2020

India's Politics And Academics: Chicken/Egg (People/System) Problem

Both Indian politics and Indian academics suffer from the same fundamental problem: the chicken-and-egg problem – or the people-and-system problem. Good people are not there in the field. Why? Because the system is not good. And why is the system not good? Because good people are not there. That is: Good people will enter the field only when the system becomes good – and the system will become good only when good people enter the field.

Of course, this is a fundamental principle of the universe. And as per this principle, there should be no progress in the world at all. But the history of the world is nothing but the story of progress. So how does progress happen – in spite of the chicken-and-egg / people-and-system principle? There are two reasons. The first reason is that the principle is not 100% rigid/watertight. Especially with regard to the egg-to-chicken part – ie, the relationship between the quality of a system and the entry of good people. Some good people (who are fools) enter a field even though the system is not good.

The second reason is that luckily for us, human/social systems are not 'digital' but 'analog'. That is – they are not binary/discrete (bad vs good; 0 vs 1) but continuous (a gradient/spectrum from bad to good; 0 to 10). So a few good people (fools) enter a bad system and make it better – which attracts more good people – who make the system even better – and so on. This is nothing but the upward spiral / virtuous cycle of progress. Of course, the critical factor here is the speed of the process – especially when we are in a dynamic environment / competitive world. We can only hope that both our academics and our politics get on to a self-sustaining path of improvement (good systems + good people) as soon as possible – and move on it as fast as possible. Aum . . .

21 June 2020

Job/Work/Career: Strengths Vs Weaknesses

JOB/WORK/CAREER: STRENGTHS VS WEAKNESSES

Conventional career/personality development theory tells us to improve in our areas of weakness. This is nonsense. Because there is no such thing as the perfect/complete worker/all-rounder. Different people have different strengths - and the 21st century is the age of teamwork and specialisation. So your success will be determined by how strong your strengths are. If you work on your weakness, you will improve from poor to average - not more than that. And what will a team do with an average skill? Instead if you work on your strength, you will improve from good to great - and you will be valuable to any team. So forget about your weaknesses - and focus on your strengths. Find out what your strengths are - and develop them. Trying to 'fix'/'repair' your weaknesses is the biggest waste of time in the world.

08 June 2020

Capital, Capitalist And Capitalism

Today the word 'capitalism' means "an economic system in which the means of production are privately owned" (as opposed to socialism – in which the means of production are owned by the government). But the original meaning of the word was quite different. The word 'capital' came first – in the 1200s. It meant simply money or wealth. The word 'capitalist' came next – in the 1600s. It meant "an owner of capital/money/wealth" – ie, merchants. Around 1800, the Industrial Revolution began and the word 'capital' acquired today's meaning – not simply money/wealth but the means of production (ie, machines and factories). Consequently, the word 'capitalist' also changed – from "owner of money/wealth" to "owner of machines/factories". Then the word 'capitalism' came in the 1800s – meaning "the economic system consisting of capitalists". This looks like a trivial definition but it is not. Defined this way, capitalism was indeed a revolutionary new economic system. Why?

Since the beginning of civilisation, capital (the means of production) consisted of small simple tools. And these tools were owned by the respective workers. The farmer owned his plough and sickle. The blacksmith owned his anvil and furnace. The carpenter owned his saw and hammer. The potter owned his wheel and the weaver owned his loom. In other words – the workers owned the capital. The Industrial Revolution changed all this – by giving birth to big complex machines (and the buildings that contained them – ie, factories). These were too expensive to be owned by ordinary workers – only rich merchants could afford to own them. So for the first time in history, capital was not owned by workers – but by another group of people: the capitalists. And the new economic system was called 'capitalism'. This was the original meaning of the word 'capitalism'.

22 May 2020

India's Systems: Quality Vs Quantity

INDIA'S SYSTEMS: QUALITY VS QUANTITY

Every system has two fundamental aspects: quality and quantity. Which is more important? Both are equally important. That is – a system must ideally maximise both quality and quantity. But given resource constraints, we can increase only one of these two parameters at a time. So to achieve both quality and quantity, a sequential approach is needed. Accordingly, two approaches are available:
Phase 1
Phase 2
Approach 1
Increase quality
Keep quantity low
Increase quantity
Maintain quality
Approach 2
Increase quantity
Keep quality low
Increase quality
Maintain quantity

Which approach is better? The critical part of the process is the second phase. In the first approach, the second phase involves increasing the quantity of a high-quality low-quantity system. In the second approach, the second phase involves increasing the quality of a high-quantity low-quality system. Which of these two processes has a higher probability of success? Once the question is framed this way, it becomes clear that the first approach has a higher probability of success – and is therefore better.

India came under foreign rule around 1000 AD – during the Agricultural Age. It remained under slavery for 1000 years – under the Turks, Mughals and British. During the period of British rule, the Agricultural Age ended and a new age in the history of mankind - the Modern/Industrial Age - started. When India finally became free in 1947, the fundamental challenge before it was to build modern systems that would be both world-class (quality) and big enough for the world's second-biggest country (quantity). And that required choosing between the two approaches described above. Unfortunately, we chose the second approach. That is – we aimed for quantity rather than quality, perhaps hoping to increase the quality later. The result is that today we are stuck with low-quality high-quantity systems whose quality we are now struggling to increase.

Classroom Education Vs Online Education

CLASSROOM EDUCATION VS ONLINE EDUCATION

"The Covid-19 crisis has changed the world forever – especially education. Classroom education is dead, obsolete and Stone Age. Online education will and should replace classroom education." This is now the consensus opinion of almost all experts and ordinary people.

I know people will call me Stone Age. But based on my 18 years experience as a student and 7 years experience as a faculty, I will say this: The classroom + blackboard + chalk is the most effective method for understanding a subject – especially complex concepts. There is no substitute for mentally wrestling with complex concepts with the help of a faculty who has been doing the same for years – along with other students who are currently doing the same.

If online education is better than classroom education because it is more 'efficient', then why stop there? Why not take this idea one step further – to its logical conclusion? Excellent textbooks are available on every subject. So the most 'efficient' option is to simply buy the textbooks, sit at home and read the textbooks. Where is the need for even an online education? To get a degree? It will be more 'efficient' for universities to only conduct exams and award degrees to those who pass the exams.

Since 1947, we have completely neglected quality and focussed only on quantity in our education. This is the #1 reason for India's under-development today. Now this online education will become another excuse to further dilute quality for the sake of quantity in our education. "We have reached X number of students", "We have trained Y number of candidates", "We have produced Z number of graduates", etc. How well have they understood the subjects? Especially complex concepts? Nobody is bothered about this.

20 May 2020

India's Debt, Fiscal Deficit And GDP Growth Rate

Let a country's GDP be G and its debt be D. Then its debt-to-GDP ratio is D/G. Let its GDP grow at a rate of g every year (0 < g < 1). Then its GDP next year will be (1 + g) × G. Let its fiscal deficit next year be F. Then its debt next year will be D + F. So its debt-to-GDP ratio next year will be (D + F)/[(1 + g) × G]. If the debt-to-GDP ratio is to remain constant, then:
D/G = (D + F)/[(1 + g) × G]

Let us express both debt and fiscal deficit as a fraction of the GDP. Let D/G be d and F/[(1 + g) × G] be f. Then the constant debt-to-GDP ratio condition becomes:
d = d /(1 + g) + f

This gives us:
1. f = d × g / (1 + g)
And:
2. g = f / (d - f)

A country starts off with a certain amount of debt (D) – which is expressed as a fraction of its GDP (D/G = d). It wants to reduce its debt-to-GDP ratio (d). How to do this? There are two ways of asking and answering this question:
1. If the country's GDP grows at a certain rate g, then it must keep its fiscal deficit (as a fraction of its GDP) below some level f. Equation 1 gives us this value of f.
2. If the country maintains its fiscal deficit (as a fraction of its GDP) at a certain level f, then its GDP must grow above some rate g. Equation 2 gives us this value of g.

India's debt-to-GDP ratio is 70% – which is the highest among major industrialising countries. How to reduce this? We can use the two equations given above. Accordingly we have:

A. Maximum fiscal deficit (based on the GDP growth rate)
GDP Growth Rate
Maximum Fiscal Deficit
5%
3.3%
6%
4.0%
7%
4.6%
8%
5.2%
9%
5.8%
10%
6.4%
Our average GDP growth rate since 2000 has been 7%.

B. Minimum GDP growth rate (based on the fiscal deficit)
Fiscal Deficit
Minimum GDP Growth Rate
3%
4.5%
4%
6.1%
5%
7.7%
6%
9.4%
7%
11.1%
8%
12.9%
9%
14.8%
10%
16.7%
Our average fiscal deficit since 2000 has been 4.5%.

Note: The 2003 Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act states that the government must reduce the fiscal deficit to 3% of GDP.

12 May 2020

Major/Important Finance Ministers Of India

Major/important finance ministers of India:

#Finance MinisterPeriodPrime Minister
1Shanmukham Chetty1947–1948Jawaharlal Nehru
2John Mathai1948–1950Jawaharlal Nehru
3Chintaman Deshmukh1950–1956Jawaharlal Nehru
4T T Krishnamachari1956–1958Jawaharlal Nehru
5Morarji Desai1958–1963Jawaharlal Nehru
6T T Krishnamachari1963–1965Nehru / L B Shastri
7Sachindra Chaudhuri1966–1967Indira Gandhi
8Morarji Desai1967–1969Indira Gandhi
9Yashwantrao Chavan1970–1974Indira Gandhi
10C Subramaniam1974–1977Indira Gandhi
11Hirubhai Patel1977–1979Indira Gandhi
12Charan Singh1979–1980Morarji Desai
13R Venkataraman1980–1982Indira Gandhi
14Pranab Mukherjee1982–1984Indira Gandhi
15V P Singh1984–1987Rajiv Gandhi
16Narayan Tiwari1987–1988Rajiv Gandhi
17Shankarrao Chavan1988–1989Rajiv Gandhi
18Madhu Dandavate1989–1990V P Singh
19Yashwant Sinha1990–1991Chandra Shekhar
20Manmohan Singh1991–1996P V Narasimha Rao
21P Chidambaram1996–1998Deve Gowda / Gujral
22Yashwant Sinha1998–2002Atal Bihari Vajpayee
23Jaswant Singh2002–2004Atal Bihari Vajpayee
24P Chidambaram2004–2008Manmohan Singh
25Pranab Mukherjee2009–2012Manmohan Singh
26P Chidambaram2012–2014Manmohan Singh
27Arun Jaitley2014–2019Narendra Modi
28Nirmala Sitaraman2019–Narendra Modi

26 April 2020

Economy, Economics And Economic Literacy

Humans need some things to live – like food, clothes, houses, etc. They obtain these things by making and exchanging them with one another. And this system of people making and exchanging things is nothing but the economic system (or simply – the economy).

Now this economic system or economy does not behave randomly. If I am holding a ball and I let go of it, what will happen? Simple: the ball will fall down. Why? Again simple: due to the law of gravity. So the ball falls down instead of going up because the law of gravity says it must fall down. That is – its behaviour is dictated by the law of gravity. More generally – the behaviour of the physical world is dictated by a set of physical laws. And these physical laws make up a science – the science called physics. Engineers build many physical systems – like machines. When they do so, they must do it on the basis of the laws of physics – for which they must know the science of physics. And we would like to understand how these machines or physical systems work. In order to do that, we must also know the science of physics.

What is true of physical systems is equally true of the economic system (economy). Just as physical systems do not behave randomly but as per certain physical laws, similarly the economy (economic system) does not behave randomly but as per certain laws of human/social behaviour – ie, economic laws. And just as the physical laws make up a science called physics, similarly the economic laws also make up a science – the science called economics. And just as we must know the science of physics to understand how physical systems work, similarly we must know the science of economics to understand how the economic system (economy) works.

Every human gets the things he/she needs to live from the economic system or economy. So the economic system or economy is directly important to every human. Thus every human must understand how the economic system or economy works. That is – every human must know economics (at least the basics). This being the case, it is shocking that we do not teach even basic economics in our schools. We teach economics only in senior high-school (ie, +2) in the Arts and Commerce streams – so the Science stream students miss out on economics completely. We must correct this by teaching at least basic economics in the 10th standard.

We must teach the most fundamental concepts of both micro-economics and macro-economics. Fundamental micro-economic concepts would include:
1. Supply and demand
2. Social surplus/welfare
3. How free-market maximises social welfare
4. How government-controls reduce social welfare
Fundamental macro-economic concepts would include:
1. Taxes and revenue
2. Government spending
3. Fiscal-deficit and debt
4. Subsidies, loan-waivers and welfare-schemes

Economic literacy is also essential for the healthy functioning of a democracy. One of the most important functions of a government is to manage the country's economy properly. If people don't know even basic economics, how will they evaluate the government's performance – and the opposition's criticism? And how will they make the right choice in the election?

25 April 2020

ಜಾತ್ಯತೀತ / ಜಾತ್ಯತೀತತೆ

Secularismಗೆ ಕನ್ನಡದಲ್ಲಿ 'ಜಾತ್ಯತೀತತೆ' ಎನ್ನುತ್ತಾರೆ. ಈ ಅನುವಾದ ಸರಿಯೇ? Secularism ಎಂದರೇನು? Secularism ಎಂದರೆ ಹಿಂದು-ಧ್ವೇಷ - ಅಂದರೆ ಹಿಂದುಗಳನ್ನು ಮತ್ತು ಹಿಂದು-ಧರ್ಮವನ್ನು ಧ್ವೇಷಿಸುವುದು. ಸೆಕ್ಯುಲರವಾದಿಗಳು/ಎಡವಾದಿಗಳು ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಹಿಂದುಗಳನ್ನು ಧ್ವೇಷಿಸುತ್ತಾರೆ - ಅಂದರೆ ಅವರು ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಜಾತಿಗಳ ಹಿಂದುಗಳನ್ನು ಧ್ವೇಷಿಸುತ್ತಾರೆ. ಆದ್ದರಿಂದ ಅವರ ಹಿಂದು-ಧ್ವೇಷ ನಿಜವಾಗಿಯೂ ಜಾತ್ಯತೀತ. ಆದುದರಿಂದ secularismಗೆ 'ಜಾತ್ಯತೀತತೆ' ಎಂಬ ಶಬ್ದ ಅತ್ಯಂತ ಸೂಕ್ತವಾಗಿದೆ.

24 April 2020

India's Muslims: Non-Fundamentalists Vs Anti-Fundamentalists

India's middle-class Muslims are non-fundamentalists. This is a good thing - but it not enough. Lower-class Muslims are so deeply sunk in fundamentalism that it is not enough for middle-class Muslims to be merely non-fundamentalist. They must do more - they must fight against fundamentalism. That is - they must become anti-fundamentalists.

PS: And needless to say - we Hindus will support them 100% in their war against fundamentalism.

21 April 2020

Varna System And Types Of Work

There are four basic types of work:
1. Working with things
2. Working with money
3. Working with people
4. Working with ideas

Accordingly, ancient Indians designed and built a social system (the Varna system) in which different groups of people specialised in each of the four basic types of work:
1. Working with things - Farmers/Workers (Shudras)
2. Working with money - Merchants/Traders (Vaishyas)
3. Working with people - Rulers/Administrators (Kshatriyas)
4. Working with ideas - Scholars/Priests (Brahmanas)

20 April 2020

China's History: Warfare, Violence, Aggression

China was born around 2000 BC - about 1000 years after India. China's history is similar to India's: many kingdoms fighting many wars with one another. But that is where the similarity stops. The nature of the warfare was completely different in each case.

In India, the armies of the two warring kingdoms would meet at the battlefield and start fighting at sunrise. At sunset, they would stop and evaluate the situation. The army which fared better was declared the winner. Then the losing king would acknowledge the winning king as his overlord - and pay him a tribute every year. Thus it was limited warfare.

In China, the war would be a fight to the finish. The winning king would kill the losing king - even if he surrendered. The winning army would kill the entire losing army - even if they surrendered. Then the winning army would march to the capital of the losing kingdom - and kill every man, woman and child in the city. Thus it was total warfare. And this went on for 4000 years.

Therefore China's history is the most violent and blood-drenched history in the world. And 4000 years of bloody warfare have made the Chinese a very violent and aggressive people. In 1949, the Chinese Communist Party made the country a completely unified state for the first time in its history. As a result, all those inter-kingdom wars came to a stop. But a national character that has developed over 4000 years cannot change overnight. So where will all that violence and aggression go? Simple: outside. That is - the violence and aggression that went into internal wars for 4000 years is now going into the outside world.

Reference: History Of China - John Keay (2008)

19 April 2020

RSS's System/Philosophy

RSS is supposed to be a Hindu and an anti-Western/modern/industrial organisation. But its system is to train people to become good social-workers; which is nothing but an industrial system - a factory. Whereas Hindu philosophy says that each human has a unique Swadharma; and the goal of life is to discover our Swadharma - and fulfill it.

18 April 2020

Congress Propaganda: Gandhi/Nehru Vs Bhagat Singh / Subhash Chandra Bose

When the Covid-19 lockdown began, I took up a small project that I had always wanted to do: To compile a list of Bollywood's all-time greatest patriotic songs. To do this, I went through all the old songs. And I found something very interesting:
1. Half the songs were familiar - I had seen them regularly on Chitrahaar (remember that program on Doordarshan?) as a kid in the 1980s and 1990s. But half the songs were new - I had never seen them on Chitrahaar.
2. Very coincidentally - the songs that Chitrahaar regularly showed glorify Gandhi and Nehru. And the songs that Chitrahaar never showed glorify Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose.

There were also state-versions of Chitrahaar - in each state's language. Extending the above analysis to Maharashtra's Marathi version of Chitrahaar, I think it never showed songs that glorify Vinayak Savarkar. My Marathi friends can confirm this.

Nice propaganda by the Congress Party!

17 April 2020

Socialism, Capitalism And India's Muslim Middle-Class

When Partition happened in 1947, most of our middle-class Muslims moved to Pakistan. So post-Partition India's Muslim community consisted mainly of lower-class Muslims. Then in 1947, Nehru adopted inefficient government-controlled socialism as our economic system. As a result, our economy grew at a rate of 3% per year. And our population grew at a rate of 2% per year - so our per capita income grew at a rate of 1% per year. But the East Asian and South East Asian countries adopted efficient free-market capitalism as their economic system - and grew at a rate of 10% per year.

Fast economic growth creates a big middle-class. Due to our slow economic growth under socialism, we were not able to create a Muslim middle-class (that we had lost in Partition). Finally in 1991, Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao changed our economic system from socialism to capitalism - and our economy started growing at the rate of 7-8% per year. This fast economic growth created a big Indian middle-class. Specifically: It created a small Muslim middle-class - for the first time since 1947.

So our Muslim middle-class is small and recent (only since 1991). Thus Nehru's socialism delayed the formation of a Muslim middle-class by almost 50 years - and therefore also delayed the modernisation of the Muslim community.

16 April 2020

Hindus And The Modernisation Of India's Muslims

Recent events (first the anti-CAA riots and now the Covid-19 outbreak) have glaringly shown how deeply our lower-class Muslims are immersed in fundamentalism. What is the solution for this? There is only one: modernisation. And who must do this? Ideally - anybody/everybody who can. But there is an important limitation here: Hindus cannot do this - because of the nature of the problem (fundamentalism). Any effort by Hindus in this regard will be a non-starter. So it has to be done by middle-class Muslims only.

Therefore Hindus have been doing nothing in this regard since 1947. And the results of this approach are there in front of us today. So this approach is clearly unsustainable. Either middle-class Muslims are not modernising their lower-class counterparts. Or their efforts are not being enough. So Hindus must either kick-start the process (if it is the former) - or accelerate the process (if it is the latter). And how to do this?

The starting point for every change-process is a discussion/conversation. The biggest problem in this matter is that there is no discussion/conversation happening at all. Why? The answer is obvious: Hindus feel that if they criticise Islamic fundamentalism (or Christian fundamentalism - but that is another story) it looks like they are criticising Islam - which is 'hatred' and therefore wrong. So we have chosen a comfortable silence since 1947. And today the results of this silence are there in front of us. Therefore this comfortable silence is no longer an option.

Hinduism says 'Sarva Mata Sama Bhaava'. So we respect all religions - including Islam. But we will not tolerate Islamic fundamentalism - which is an evil ideology. We must be very clear about this difference. That will give us the confidence to criticise Islamic fundamentalism freely and openly - based on facts/logic. At the same time, we must (equally freely and openly) support the middle-class Muslims who are trying to modernise their lower-class counterparts. There is no contradiction between respecting Islam on the one hand and criticising Islamic fundamentalism on the other hand. In fact - the two approaches are two sides of the same coin. Each strengthens the other. And each is incomplete without the other.

We are all one country - India. We will all either prosper together - or we will all go down together. These are our only two options - there is no third option. So let us all work together to make our country better. Bharat Mata ki jai.

Bollywood's Greatest Patriotic Songs

Bollywood's greatest patriotic songs (in rough chronological order):


1. Vande Mataram
Lyrics: Bankim Chandra Chatterjee
Music: Hemant Kumar
Voice: Hemant Kumar
Movie: Anand Math (1952)

2. Kadam Kadam Badhaye Ja
Lyrics: Vanshidhar Shukla
Music: Ram Singh Thakur
Voice: Ramchandra Chitalkar
Movie: Samadhi (1950)

3. Mera Rang De Basanti Chola
Lyrics: Ram Prasad Bismil
Music: Prem Dhawan
Voices: Mahendra Kapoor, Mukesh, Rajendra Mehta
Movie: Shaheed (1965)

4. Sarfaroshi Ki Tamanna
Lyrics: Bismil Azimabadi
Music: Prem Dhawan
Voices: Mohammed Rafi, Manna Dey, Rajendra Mehta
Movie: Shaheed (1965)

5. Aao Bacho Tumhe Dikhaye
Lyrics: Kavi Pradeep
Music: Hemant Kumar
Voice: Kavi Pradeep
Movie: Jagriti (1954)

6. Yeh Desh Hai Veer Jawanon Ka
Lyrics: Sahir Ludhianvi
Music: Omkar Nayyar
Voice: Mohammed Rafi
Movie: Naya Daur (1957)

7. Aye Mere Pyare Watan
Lyrics: Prem Dhawan
Music: Salil Chaudhari
Voice: Manna Dey
Movie: Kabuliwala (1961)

8. Ab Tumhare Hawale Watan Sathiyo
Lyrics: Kaifi Azmi
Music: Madan Mohan
Voice: Mohammed Rafi
Movie: Haqeeqat (1964)

9. Apni Azadi Ko Hum
Lyrics: Shakil Badayuni
Music: Naushad Ali
Voice: Mohammed Rafi
Movie: Leader (1964)

10. Aye Watan Aye Watan
Lyrics: Prem Dhawan
Music: Prem Dhawan
Voice: Mohammed Rafi
Movie: Shaheed (1965)

11. Jahan Daal Daal Par
Lyrics: Rajendra Krishan
Music: Hansraj Behl
Voice: Mohammed Rafi
Movie: Sikandar E Azam (1965)

12. Mere Desh Ki Dharti
Lyrics: Gulshan Bawra
Music: Kalyanji-Anandji
Voice: Mahendra Kapoor
Movie: Upkaar (1967)

13. Hai Preet Jahan Ki Reet Sada
Lyrics: Indivar
Music: Kalyanji-Anandji
Voice: Mahendra Kapoor
Movie: Purab Aur Paschim (1970)

14. Taqat Watan Ki
Lyrics: Gopaldas Neeraj
Music: Sachin Burman
Voices: Manna Dey, Mohammed Rafi
Movie: Prem Pujari (1970)

15. Har Karam Apna Karenge
Lyrics: Anand Bakshi
Music: Laxmikant-Pyarelal
Voices: Kavita Krishnamurti, Mohammed Aziz
Movie: Karma (1986)

15 April 2020

Microeconomic Foundations Of Macroeconomics?

# Neo-classical microeconomics looks at economic agents - by assuming them to be rational maximisers.
# Keynes gave birth to macroeconomics which looks at the aggregate economy independently - ie, without bothering about microeconomics.
# Neo-classicists attacked Keynesian macroeconomics - saying it does not have 'solid microeconomic foundations'.
# Neo-Keynesians are responding by building the 'solid microeconomic foundations' for Keynesian macroeconomics.
# But all this is funny when the foundation of microeconomics (rational maximisation) is itself being broken - by behavioural economics.

07 April 2020

India's School-Education System & Basic Literacy Skills

My students are bombarding me with demands for the 'notes' for my subjects. Last year's lectures have been recorded and the videos are available to them. They also have the textbook - its PDF is available free on the Internet. Still they are insisting on 'notes'.

For understanding a subject, the most effective method is listening to a lecture. The second most effective method is reading a good textbook. The least effective method is reading 'notes'. Still my students are insisting on 'notes'.

How do we understand a subject through the first two (effective) methods? The process consists of these steps:
1. Reading/Listening
2. Understanding
3. Thinking logically
Now these also happen to be basic literacy skills - which are the foundation for all other skills. Once students have these fundamental skills, they can develop other higher level skills.

So if the students are insisting on 'notes', that means they do not have these basic literacy skills. This is a damning indictment of India's school-education system. It means that we are basically producing a nation of educated illiterates. How will we survive in the 21st century - which is the Knowledge Century?

02 April 2020

Minimum WhatsApp Group Distance (MWGD)

Consider any of your WhatsApp groups. Consider any other member of that group - let us call him/her as X. Now you are connected to X through one WhatsApp group. That is - the Minimum WhatsApp Group Distance (MWGD) between you and X = 1.

Now consider any other of X's WhatsApp groups (which you are not a member of). And consider any other member of that group (with whom you don't share any WhatsApp group) - let us call him/her as Y. So you are connected to Y through two WhatsApp groups. That is - the MWGD between you and Y = 2.

Now almost all the 40 crore Indians on WhatsApp are connected to one another like this. The only thing that varies is the MWGD. The lesser the MWGD between two persons, we can say they are 'closer' to each other. The greater the MWGD between two persons, we can say they are 'farther' from each other.

Question: What may be the MWGD between the two Indians who are 'farthest' from each other?

25 February 2020

Money, Survival, Work and Happiness

# Without money we cannot survive. So money is needed for survival.
# Most people think: "I need Rs X to survive and another Rs Y to be happy. So I need Rs Z = X + Y to survive and be happy."
# But happiness comes from work – ie, from doing the work that we like doing. So the thinking stated above is wrong.
# In the 21st century, 99% of jobs/careers pay us at least Rs X – the money we need to survive.
# So don't run after the extra Rs Y that you think will make you happy – because it will not.
# Instead just find out what you like doing – and make it your job/career.