| . | ||
| 1. Nationality of the rulers | ||
| . | ||
| 2. Objective of the system | ||
| . | ||
| 3. Basis of the system | ||
| . | ||
| 4. Political nature | ||
| . | ||
| 5. Economic objective | ||
| . | ||
| 6. Religious agenda | ||
| . | ||
| 7. Legal basis |
05 November 2012
India: Ancient Vs Medieval - Traditional Vs Feudal Politico-Economic Systems
A comparison of the politico-economic systems of ancient and medieval India (traditional vs feudal):
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
common that comparison has too many flaws and lil one sided.
honest opinion.. sorry if it doesnt agree with you
Akbar the Great initiated certain important policies, such as religious liberalism (abolition of the jizya tax), inclusion of natives in the affairs of the empire, and political alliance/marriage with the Indian rulers of north India, that were innovative for his milieu; he also adopted some policies of Sher Shah Suri, such as the division of the empire into sarkar raj, in his administration of the empire. These policies, which undoubtedly served to maintain the power and stability of the empire, were preserved by his two immediate successors
Post a Comment