Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts

17 July 2026

Christopher Nolan's 'Odyssey': Movie Review

CHRISTOPHER NOLAN'S 'ODYSSEY': MOVIE REVIEW

Christopher Nolan brings Homer's timeless epic to life in the 21st century . . .

Is man the master of his fate? Or is fate more powerful than man? Homer's 'Odyssey' asked this question almost 3000 years ago. And today we are still asking this question. That is the thing about great epics like Iliad, Odyssey, Ramayana and Mahabharata - they are timeless. And a great storyteller like Christopher Nolan can bring them to life for his time . . .

18 March 2026

Dhurandhar: The Revenge - Review

REVIEW

Dhurandhar: The Revenge does not have part one's perfection. But what it lacks in perfection, it makes up in fun. So with all its imperfections, it is still one hell of a ride.

If Aditya Dhar had given as much as care to part two's script as he had given to part one's script, then part two would have been an all-time great movie (like part one) and the duology would have been an all-time great cinematic work (like Dark Knight Trilogy). As such, both part two and the duology fall short of all-time greatness. But still, Aditya Dhar and his team have given lovers of India and Indian cinema something to cherish for a very long time . . .

20 December 2025

Best Movies Of 2025

Best Movies Of 2025

1. Kantara: Chapter 1
2. Dhurandhar
3. Phule
4. 120 Bahadur
5. Haq
6. Tanvi The Great
7. F1
8. Complete Unknown
9. Avatar: Fire And Ash
10. Mission Impossible: Final Reckoning

06 December 2025

'Dhurandhar' Movie Review

MOVIE REVIEW

How do you kill a pack of wolves? You send a tiger disguised as a wolf into the wolves' den - and kill them one by one. 'Dhurandhar' is the story of an Indian spy who infiltrates Pakistan's network of mafia gangs, intelligence agencies and terrorist groups - and gives them a dose of their own medicine.

An excellent action-thriller. A grand epic that must be seen on the big screen. A must-watch for every Indian.

Written and directed by Aditya Dhar. Starring Ranveer Singh, Sanjay Dutt, Akshaye Khanna, Arjun Rampal and R Madhavan . . .

25 April 2025

'Phule' Movie Review

'PHULE' MOVIE REVIEW

An excellent movie about Jyotirao Phule and Savitribai Phule - the great social reformers who uplifted lower-castes and rehabilitated widows in the 1800s. They started schools for lower-caste children (especially girls) and opened shelters for widows. They ignited a revolution in Poona that spread to the whole country. Maharaja Sayaji Rao Gaekwad of Baroda rightly conferred upon Jyotirao Phule the title of 'Mahatma'. Later social reformers like Gandhiji and Ambedkar would draw inspiration from them. 'Phule' is a moving and inspiring story of courage, sacrifice and service. Written/directed by Anant Mahadevan and starring Pratik Gandhi and Patralekha Paul. Pranaam, Jyotirao and Savitribai . . .

29 December 2024

Best Movies Of 2024

BEST MOVIES OF 2024

1. Phulwanti
2. Main Atal Hoon
3. Article 370
4. Razakar
5. Gladiator 2
6. Kingdom Of Planet Of Apes
7. Alien: Romulus

13 October 2024

'Phulwanti' Movie Review

'PHULWANTI' MOVIE REVIEW

Based on the famous novel (of the same name) by the great Marathi writer Babasaheb Purandare, 'Phulwanti' is a beautiful meditation on the relationship between knowledge and the scholar (and art and the artist) - and also the real meaning of love. The script, direction, acting, set design, costume design, music and choreography are all top-notch. The movie has English sub-titles.

[An economist's irrelevant aside:
A civilisation that can produce a great work of art like Babasaheb Purandare's 'Phulwanti' is indeed a great civilisation. Where we have fallen short is in building efficient systems - like economic system, administration system, etc . . .]

20 January 2024

'Main Atal Hoon': Movie Review

REVIEW:

'Main Atal Hoon' is not just the inspiring journey of a man from swayamsevak to RSS pracharak to BJP leader to Prime Minister. It is the electrifying saga of the rise of modern nationalism in this sacred land. It is the soaring epic of the birth of a strong state in this ancient civilisation. Script-writer Rishi Virmani and director Ravi Jadhav deserve the highest praise for telling us this story in a powerful and exciting way. The movie also shows us Vajpayee's personal life in a very mature and dignified manner.

As for Pankaj Tripathi, he is a great actor who has given many great performances - and will give many more. But this is the greatest performance of his career - and one of the greatest of all time. He disappears completely right in front of our eyes - and brings Atal Bihari Vajpayee to life fully. We even forget that an actor called Pankaj Tripathi exists in this world.

My only criticism: The movie does not even mention Vajpayee's greatest achievement - privatisation. But economics is interesting only to economists - and to everybody else, it is the most boring subject in the world. So this omission is understandable.

'Main Atal Hoon' is basically the story of a man who loved India with all his heart. So watching this movie is like bathing in the sweet waters of Mother India's love.
Pranaam, Atal-ji . . .

23 December 2023

Best Movies Of 2023

BEST MOVIES OF 2023

1. ಟೋಬಿ (Toby)
2. Sam Bahadur
3. Woman King
4. Killers Of Flower Moon
5. Oppenheimer
6. Haunting In Venice
7. Fabelmans
8. Golda
9. Dumb Money
10. Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning


02 October 2022

'Ponniyin Selvan - 1': Movie Review

PONNIYIN SELVAN - 1: MOVIE REVIEW

The Chola Empire (900-1200) was one of India's biggest, richest and most powerful empires. In 1955, Tamil writer Ramaswamy Krishnamurthy (aka 'Kalki') wrote a novel called 'Ponniyin Selvan' ('Son of Kaveri') about the first Chola Emperor - Rajaraja I. Now Mani Ratnam brings the novel to the big screen.

Translating a novel with a complicated story, many characters and many plot-lines into a 3-hour movie is not easy - and it shows in the screenplay (by Mani Ratnam, Elango Kumaravel and B Jeyamohan). A voice-over narration with maps would have helped viewers to understand/appreciate the details of the story better - especially those (like me) who have neither read the book nor are experts on the Chola Empire. The biggest strengths of the movie are the technical departments. Costume designer Eka Lakhani and set designer Thota Tharani beautifully re-create the Chola Empire. Cameraman Ravi Varman and editor A Sreekar Prasad compensate for the weaknesses of the screenplay - especially in the war/battle scenes. A R Rahman's music is good. In the acting department, Vikram and Aishwarya Rai get the most complex/interesting characters and do justice to them - justifying their star billing.

If you love Indian history, PS-1 is a must-watch. Even if you don't, it is a good all-round entertainer . . .

04 March 2018

Best English/Hollywood Movies of 2017

The best English/Hollywood movies of 2017:

1. Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri
2. Dunkirk
3. Lady Bird
4. The Post
5. Darkest Hour
6. Shape Of Water
7. Hostiles
8. All The Money In The World
9. Logan Lucky
10. Thank You For Your Service

30 December 2017

Best Kannada Movies of 2017

Best Kannada movies of 2017:

1. Maarikondavaru
2. ‎Ondu Motteya Kathe
3. ‎Railway Children
4. ‎Happy New Year
5. ‎Dayavittu Gaminisi

29 December 2017

Best Hindi/Bollywood Movies of 2017

Best Hindi/Bollywood movies of 2017:

1. Hindi Medium
2. ‎Secret Superstar
3. ‎Ghazi Attack
4. ‎Toilet: Ek Prem Katha
5. Raag Desh
6. ‎Mukti Bhawan
7. ‎Gurgaon
8. ‎Newton
9. ‎Death In The Gunj
10. ‎Rangoon

Special mention
* Sarkar 3

17 December 2017

'Star Wars: Last Jedi' - Review

Review (contains a spoiler):

A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away, there was a brilliant Jedi Knight called Anakin Skywalker. But his desire for power made him succumb to the Dark Side of the Force - and he became a Sith Lord: Darth Vader. He became the evil Emperor Palpatine's trusted right-hand man. He kills the Emperor only in the end - to save his son Luke Skywalker. This was the story that the first six Star Wars movies told us. But here's a question: if Anakin Skywalker / Darth Vader was truly ambitious, then why stop at being the #2 guy? Why not become the #1 guy?

Force Awakens (Episode 7, 2015) was nothing but a remake of A New Hope (Episode 4, 1977). That is, it was nothing but a repeat of the original story - with just the characters recycled: 'Kylo Ren' instead of Darth Vader, 'Supreme Leader Snoke' instead of Emperor Palpatine, 'Rey' instead of Luke Skywalker, 'Finn' and 'Poe Dameron' as Rey's companions (filling in for Princess Leia and Han Solo) - and Luke Skywalker himself taking the place of Master Yoda. Rian Johnson's Last Jedi (Episode 8) also repeats the original story - but with one important change: the above-mentioned twist.

The first half is just a mountain of new characters, new plotlines, light-sabre duels and space-ship battles. The recipe looks something like "1 kg potatoes + 1 kg onions + 1 kg carrots + 1 kg beans + 1 kg peas + 1 kg garlic + 1 kg chillies + 1 kg tamarind + 1 kg salt + 1 kg pepper" - ie, over-stuffed. It is only in the second half, when the above-mentioned twist kicks in, that the movie finds its logic and direction. A leaner and meaner Last Jedi would have been much better. But that is too much to expect - considering the money Disney has at stake.

There isn't much of acting here. Adam Driver's Kylo Ren is - with his conflicts and torments - potentially the meatiest character (like Hayden Christensen's Anakin Skywalker was in the original story). But the script simply doesn't give the character the time and scenes needed to do justice to it. Mark Hamill with his grey hair and beard looks venerable enough as the elderly Jedi Knight. But the performance that stays with you is Carrie Fisher's. She exudes grace and dignity in her final innings as Princess Leia. Last Jedi will be Star Wars fans' fond farewell to her. Goodbye, dear princess. You will always be in our hearts - and the Force will always be with you . . .

PS: The good news is Rian Johnson has rescued this trilogy after its disastrous start by J J Abrams. The bad news is Abrams will be back to direct Episode 9.

22 October 2017

'Secret Superstar': Review

Review:

* India has 940 females for every 1000 males. The natural sex ratio is 950 females for every 1000 males. So this means about 70 lakh girls and women are 'missing' in India.
* India's male life expectancy is 67 years and female life expectancy is 70 years - only 3 years more. In industrialised countries, female life expectancy is 7 years more than the male life expectancy.
* India's male literacy rate is 82% and female literacy rate is 65% - almost 20% lesser.

People say we ill-treat girls and women from their birth to their death. They are wrong. We start ill-treating them even before their birth. We kill girls before they are born. If they are born, we don't treat them as full humans having equal rights. And we say it is 'normal' for a man to beat his wife. The condition of girls and women in our country does not make for a very pretty picture.

Sociology tells us that agricultural society is gender-unequal and industrial society is gender-equal. So as India transforms from an agricultural society to an industrial society through the technological and economic process of modernisation, the situation will improve. True. Technology and economics are powerful forces. But there is another force that is even more powerful - the most powerful force in the world: love. And the greatest love in the world is a mother's love.

Advait Chandan's Secret Superstar is a no-holds-barred examination of India's shameful treatment of its girls and women. This itself would make it a good movie. But at its heart, it is a simple story about a mother's love for her child/daughter. Secret Superstar is beautiful, wonderful and uplifting. It is a moving tribute to the heroes of the world - and the visible gods: the mothers. Maatru devo bhava . . . Janani swargaat api gariyasi . . . Vande maataram . . .

08 October 2017

'Blade Runner 2049' Review: Science Fiction and Philosophy

Review:

Q: What is 'the real world'?
A: The world we live in, the world we know - the world we see, hear and touch every day.

Q: What is philosophy?
A: Asking questions about the world and about life. What is truth? What is reality? Is there a truth/reality beyond this world?

Q: What is science fiction?
A: An imaginary story set in an imaginary world of the future with imaginary advanced science & technology.

We live every day in 'the real world'. We accept it as it is and don't ask any questions. Art - especially science fiction - can be a powerful tool for looking at our world in a different way and asking questions about it. That is, science fiction can be a powerful tool for philosophy.

In movies, the best examples of this are the Wachowski brothers' Matrix 1 (1999) and Matrix 2 (2003). Matrix 1 dealt with reality vs perception. Matrix 2 dealt with free will vs determinism.

In other words, science fiction is the means and philosophy is the end. This is how it should be. The problem is sometimes the opposite happens - science fiction becomes the end and philosophy becomes the means. That is - instead of using science fiction to ask philosophical questions about our real world of today, a book/movie tries to ask philosophical questions about an imaginary science-fiction world of the future. This is not philosophy - it is pseudo-philosophy.

The classic examples of this are Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and Ridley Scott's Blade Runner (1982). American and European critics hailed both these movies as masterpieces - because they don't know the difference between philosophy and pseudo-philosophy.

And now Dennis Villeneuve gives us the sequel to Blade Runner - Blade Runner 2049. Again, American and European critics have hailed the movie - calling it the 21st century version of Blade Runner. They are absolutely right. In Blade Runner, a man falls in love with a robot. In Blade Runner 2049, a robot falls in love with a hologram.

20 August 2017

'ಮಾರಿಕೊಂಡವರು' ('Maarikondavaru') Review

Review of 'ಮಾರಿಕೊಂಡವರು':

The Patel (zamindar) of a riverside village is engaged in illegal sand mining. He wants to get a road built along the river to facilitate his operations. But this will lead to several poor farmers losing their lands. An educated young Dalit of the village takes up the farmers' cause and fights against the Patel. The Patel responds by using his money, power and also the caste divisions in the village.

Director K Shivarudrayya has seamlessly combined writer Devanur Mahadev's three short stories into a simple but realistic depiction of a village. With its cocktail of corruption and casteism, the village is also a microcosm of India.

Maarikondavaru won the second prize for Best Picture last year (the first prize went to Tithi).

12 August 2017

'Toilet: Ek Prem Katha' - Review

Review of 'Toilet: Ek Prem Katha':

Keshav (Akshay Kumar) runs a cycle shop in a village. His horoscope says he is cursed and that the curse can be removed only by marrying a girl with 3 thumbs. His father, an orthodox pandit, believes this strongly. So Keshav is 36 years old and single. Then he meets a girl called Jaya (Bhumi Pednekar) and they fall in love. But she has only 2 thumbs (like most of us). Through some innovative bio-engineering, Keshav manages to fool his father and marry Jaya. The next day, she comes to know that there is no toilet in the house. An educated girl from a middle class family, she is shocked and disgusted. But the pandit is dead against having a toilet in the house (due to a medieval degraded version of Hinduism). Jaya somehow manages for some time, but finally her patience snaps and she goes away to her parents' house. Keshav then starts fighting against his father, his village and the government to get a toilet in his house.

Shree Narayan Singh's Toilet: Ek Prem Katha may sound like a documentary at some points. But it is first and foremost a heartfelt story of a man/husband and woman/wife who love each other - but have to struggle against the society they live in. Toilet is both a hilarious comedy and a sensitive love story. It is also an angry protest against feudalism and a passionate cry for common sense, decency and dignity of women.

The English-language media (ELM) has given Toilet mostly negative reviews. So ELM's movie critics are as biased as its political news reporters/anchors/editors.

05 August 2017

'Raag Desh' - Review

A review of 'Raag Desh':

In 1937, Japan started World War 2 by invading China. In 1939, Germany started the war in Europe by invading Poland. Britain declared war on Germany on behalf of the entire British Empire, including India – without the consent of Indians. In 1941, Japan attacked America and invaded South East Asia. Again Britain declared war on Japan on behalf of the entire British Empire, including India – without the consent of Indians.

Accordingly, the British Indian Army fought against the Japanese Army in South East Asia. Though it fought bravely, it lost and had to surrender in 1942. Then Subhash Chandra Bose came and told the Indian soldiers that their real duty was to fight against the British – and free India. Around 50,000 soldiers answered his call – and the Indian National Army (Azad Hind Fauj) was born.

INA fought bravely against the British under the leadership of Bose. But finally in 1945, America defeated Japan – and INA had to surrender to the British. The British denounced all INA soldiers as traitors and decided to court-martial all INA officers for treason. They started by court-martialling 3 officers (Prem Kumar Sehgal, Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon, Shah Nawaz Khan) in Red Fort in November 1945. The Indian National Congress decided to defend the 3 officers. It chose the eminent lawyer Bhulabhai Desai for the job.

The court-martial was just a formality. The verdict was a foregone conclusion. But Bhulabhai Desai fought the case like a tiger – using all his legal expertise. Finally in December the trial ended as expected: all the 3 officers were found guilty.

Meanwhile with the end of the war, Indians gradually came to know about the heroism of Bose and his INA. The whole country was filled with respect and admiration for their patriotism and courage. The court-martial only served to ignite the already burning hearts of Indians. The British came to know this and wisely decided not to punish the 3 officers – they simply dismissed them from the Army.

How did Britain rule India for 200 years? A country can rule another country only by force – ie, by its army. But an army needs men. So how could a small country like Britain have an army big enough to control a big country like India (which was 25 times bigger)? The simple answer is that it did not. The 'British Army' in India was actually a British Indian Army. That is, only its officers were British – all the soldiers were Indians. So how did Britain control India with this British Indian Army? Simple: The Indian soldiers were loyal to the British. Thus the central fact about British rule in India was that it depended completely on one factor: the loyalty of Indian soldiers to the British. As long as this factor existed, the British Raj was unshakable.

The heroics of INA in the war and the court-martial of its officers ignited the flame of patriotism in not just ordinary Indians – but more importantly, among Indian soldiers. Just a month after the court-martial (in February 1946) 10,000 sailors of the Indian Navy revolted against the British. The revolt was somehow put down, but the British realised what was happening. The foundation of their rule – the loyalty of Indian soldiers – had disappeared. The writing was on the wall – their rule in India was over. A year later (in February 1947) Britain's Prime Minister Clement Attlee announced that the British would leave India.

Tigmanshu Dhulia's Raag Desh tells the story of this important chapter in India's history. Our Leftist historians have completely erased Subhash Chandra Bose and INA from the story of our freedom struggle. Raag Desh provides a much-needed corrective to this gross distortion. Mohit Marwah, Amit Sadh and Kunal Kapoor play the 3 officers and Kenny Basumatary plays Subhash Chandra Bose. The movie features the famous INA marching song 'Kadam Kadam Badhaye Ja'.

31 July 2017

'Indu Sarkar' - Review

Review:

There are two types of historical movies:
1. Non-fictional
2. Fictional
A non-fictional historical movie tells the story of actual historical events and actual historical persons. Example: Richard Attenborough's Gandhi tells the story of Gandhiji's life and India's freedom struggle. A fictional historical movie tells the fictional story of fictional characters against the backdrop of historical events. Example: Leo Tolstoy's novel War and Peace (made into several movie versions) tells the story of three characters against the backdrop of Napoleon's invasion of Russia. Non-fictional historical movies focus on the decisions and actions of rulers and leaders. Fictional historical movies focus on the lives of ordinary people and how they are impacted by historical events.

These were the two models in front of Madhur Bhandarkar when he decided to make a movie on the Emergency (1975–77). Which one did he choose? Strangely, both. His Indu Sarkar is a hybrid movie: 50% non-fiction and 50% fiction. The non-fictional part shows Sanjay Gandhi and his gang of thugs implementing the Emergency. The fictional part tells the story of a girl called Indu Sarkar (?!) whose life is impacted by the Emergency.

Madhur Bhandarkar has made two blunders here. Firstly, he should have junked the non-fictional part and kept the movie completely fictional. Secondly, the Emergency was a complex event with many different features:
1) Forced sterilisation campaign
2) Demolition of slums
3) Imprisonment of political workers
4) Censorship of press
5) Underground resistance movement
To give a complete picture of the Emergency, a movie about it must show all these different developments. But this is impossible if you tell the story of just one character – because it is impossible for one person to experience all these different developments. The solution is to have several different characters, with each character experiencing one of these different developments, and to tell the story of each of those characters. And together, those several different stories would make up the movie.

Madhur Bhandarkar is a good director who has made good movies like Chandni Bar and Page 3. He has missed a golden opportunity to make a powerful movie about the darkest chapter in post-1947 India's history . . .