19 December 2022

2022 People Of The Year: Monetary Policy Committee

The defining event of 2022 for the world has been the Ukraine War (which started in February) - and the high inflation it caused all over the world. In fact, 2022 has been 'The Year Of High Inflation'. Controlling inflation is the job of the Reserve Bank of India - specifically the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC). The MPC's job has not been easy - they could not simply increase the policy interest rate (repo rate) to decrease inflation. One, the inflation was mainly supply-driven (due to the supply shock of the war) - and not demand-driven (which would have made it more amenable to an interest rate increase). Two, the economy was just recovering from the Covid-19 recession - so aggressive interest rate hikes would have killed the recovery.

Everybody is a genius after the event. When inflation suddenly increased in the beginning of the year, many economists started criticising the MPC for being 'behind the curve' - ie, too slow in increasing the repo rate. The MPC courageously stood their ground and stuck to their path. Now at the end of the year, the MPC seems to be vindicated. Inflation came down to 5.88% in November (vs 7.1% in America and 10.1% in Europe). And GDP grew by a decent 6.3% in the Jul-Sep quarter.

For rescuing India from the scourge of inflation that has ravaged the whole world, the members of the MPC are 2022's People Of The Year:
# Dr Ashima Goyal
# Dr Jayant Varma
# Dr Shashank Bhide
# Dr Rajiv Ranjan
# Dr Michael Patra
# Sri Shaktikant Das

PS: Credit also belongs to the Finance Ministry for following a conservative fiscal policy during and after the Covid-19 crisis - which has kept inflation from getting out of control (like it has done in the advanced economies of America and Europe).

01 November 2022

Karnataka: The Land Of Philosophers And Warriors

Mother Karnataka
The land of philosophers and warriors
Philosophers who enlightened the country with their knowledge
Warriors who protected the country with their sword
The land of Basaveshwara and Madhvacharya
The land of Krishna Deva Raya and Kempe Gowda
The land of Akka Maha Devi and Kittur Rani Channamma
I bow my head at Your feet
O Mother Karnataka

07 October 2022

'ಚೋಳ ಚೋಳ' / 'Chola Chola' Kannada Song Lyrics

'CHOLA CHOLA' KANNADA SONG LYRICS

This beautiful song perfectly captures the spirit of ancient India - a great civilisation built on strength and courage, and protected by brave warriors . . .

Lyrics: Ilango Krishnan (Tamil) / Jayant Kaikini (Kannada)
Singers: Ravi Basrur, Nakul Abhyankar
Music: A R Rahman
Movie: Ponniyin Selvan - 1

ಕುಣಿ ಕುಣಿ ಧ್ವಜ ಹಿಡಿದು
ಗಗನದಲ್ಲಿ ಪಟ ಪಟ ಪಟ ಬಡಿದು
ಕದನದಲ್ಲಿ ಹಟ ಹಟ ಹಟ ಮೆರೆದು
ಕುದುರೆಗಳು ಪುಟ ಪುಟ ಪುಟ ನೆಗೆದು

ವಿಜಯವಿದು ಕಾದಾಡು ಕಾದಾಡು
ಹೋರಾಡು ಹೋರಾಡು
ಮೊಳಗಲಿ ಹುಲಿಗಳೆ ವೀರಗರ್ಜನೆ
ಭುವನದಿ ಬೆರಗಿನ ಚೋಳ ವರ್ಣನೆ

ಹೆದರದು ಹುಲಿ ಎಲ್ಲಿದ್ದರೂ
ಏನೆಂದರೂ ಚೋಳ ಚೋಳ
ಅರಿಯದು ಹುಲಿ ಸೋಲೆಂದರೇ
ಏನೆಂಬುದಾ ಕೇಳಾ ಕೇಳಾ
ನಾಗಾಲೋಟ ಹೊಳೆದಿದೆ ಉರಿಗಣ್ಣಲ್ಲೇ
ವೀರಾವೇಶ ಖುರಪುಟಗಳ ದೂಳಿನಲ್ಲೇ

ಕುಣಿ ಕುಣಿ ಧ್ವಜ ಹಿಡಿದು . . .

ವಿಜಯವಿದು ಕಾದಾಡು ಕಾದಾಡು . . .

ಹನಿ ಮದಿರೆಗೆ ಓಲಾಡುತಾ
ತೇಲಾಡುತಾ ನನ್ನ ಲೋಕ
ಇಹ ಪರಗಳು ಒಂದಾಗಿರೇ
ಸಂಗಾತಿಯಾ ಆಸೆ ಬೇಕಾ

ಮಣ್ಣೀನ ಗುಣವೇ ಮಾತಾಡು
ಕಣ್ಣೀರ ಕ್ಷಣವೇ ಮಾತಾಡು
ಮತ್ತೇರೋ ಗುಟುಕೇ ಮಾತಾಡು
ಮುದ್ದಾದ ಮಾರಾಯ್ತಿ ಮಾತಾಡು

ಮಣ್ಣೀನ ಗುಣವೇ ಮಾತಾಡು . . .

ಲಲನೇ
ನನ್ನ ಕಾಯವು ಗಾಯವು ನೀನೇ

ಇದೊ ಇದೊ ತನುವಿನಲಿ
ಸಮರಗಳ ವಿಧ ವಿಧ ಹಳೆ ಕಲೆಯು
ಹೃದಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಬಿರಿ ಬಿರಿಯುವ ಉರಿಯು
ಕರೆಯುತಿದೆ ಕೊಡು

ಸೋಮರಸ ಗುಟುಕೇ ಸುರಿದು
ಇದೇ ಕಾಳಗವು ನೋಡಿನ್ನು
ಹಿಡೀ ಖಡ್ಗವನು ಸೆಳೆದು ಹಿರಿದು
ಸಿಡೀ ಮರೆಯದಿರು ಸೇಡನ್ನು

ಹನಿ ಮದಿರೆಗೆ ಓಲಾಡುತಾ . . .

ಕಂಡಿತ್ತೋ ಮಹಾನಾಡು ಕನಸಲಿ
ತುಂಬಿತ್ತೋ ಆಹಾ ಧೈರ್ಯ ಎದೆಯಲಿ
ಕುಂದಿತ್ತೋ ಅರಿ ಸೈನ್ಯ ಎದುರಿನಲಿ
ಕೆಂಪಿತ್ತೋ ಹೊಸಬಾನು ನಸುಕಲಿ
ಹಂಚಿತ್ತೋ ಸಮಾಚಾರ ಜಗದಲಿ
ಮಿಂಚಿತ್ತೋ ಸದಾ ಶೌರ್ಯ ಅಭಯದಲಿ

ಒಗ್ಗಟ್ಟಾಗಿಯೇ ಬದ್ಧರು ನಾವು
ಪ್ರಾಣಕ್ಕೂ ಸಹ ಸಿದ್ದರು ನಾವು
ಭೂಮಿ ಮೆಟ್ಟಿ ಬಾನ ತಟ್ಟಿ
ಬಾ ಗೆಲ್ಲುವ ತಲೆಯ ಎತ್ತಿ

ಕುಣಿ ಕುಣಿ ಧ್ವಜ ಹಿಡಿದು . . .

ವಿಜಯವಿದು ಕೊಡು
ಸೋಮರಸ ಗುಟುಕೇ ಸುರಿದು . . .

02 October 2022

'Ponniyin Selvan - 1': Movie Review

PONNIYIN SELVAN - 1: MOVIE REVIEW

The Chola Empire (900-1200) was one of India's biggest, richest and most powerful empires. In 1955, Tamil writer Ramaswamy Krishnamurthy (aka 'Kalki') wrote a novel called 'Ponniyin Selvan' ('Son of Kaveri') about the first Chola Emperor - Rajaraja I. Now Mani Ratnam brings the novel to the big screen.

Translating a novel with a complicated story, many characters and many plot-lines into a 3-hour movie is not easy - and it shows in the screenplay (by Mani Ratnam, Elango Kumaravel and B Jeyamohan). A voice-over narration with maps would have helped viewers to understand/appreciate the details of the story better - especially those (like me) who have neither read the book nor are experts on the Chola Empire. The biggest strengths of the movie are the technical departments. Costume designer Eka Lakhani and set designer Thota Tharani beautifully re-create the Chola Empire. Cameraman Ravi Varman and editor A Sreekar Prasad compensate for the weaknesses of the screenplay - especially in the war/battle scenes. A R Rahman's music is good. In the acting department, Vikram and Aishwarya Rai get the most complex/interesting characters and do justice to them - justifying their star billing.

If you love Indian history, PS-1 is a must-watch. Even if you don't, it is a good all-round entertainer . . .

20 September 2022

'Dark Knight Rises': The Pit - Meaning/Philosophy

DARK KNIGHT RISES: THE PIT - MEANING/PHILOSOPHY

In Dark Knight Rises (2012), Bruce Wayne is imprisoned by Bane in an underground prison - The Pit. There is a provision for the prisoners to escape from the prison by climbing out - with a rope tied to their waist for safety. In the entire history of the prison, not a single prisoner succeeds in climbing out. Every one of them falls during their climb - and the rope protects them from dying. Bruce Wayne also tries to escape in the same way - and meets the same fate. Finally he succeeds in escaping - by climbing out without the rope.

The rope seems to be a good thing - it keeps the prisoners from dying. But it is really a chain that keeps them inside the prison. Our life is full of such ropes. We hang on to them for safety. But they prevent us from escaping from our prisons. To become free, we must let go of the rope and climb out without it. But do we have the courage to do this?

06 August 2022

Atma Shakti Nirbhar Bharat

Atma Nirbhar Bharat means a self-reliant India. But the 21st century world is a globalised world. The production of almost all products has become a global process. So the only way for a country to create jobs is to become a part of the global production system. The problem with Atma-Nirbhar / self-reliance is that it suggests isolation - ie, cutting ourselves off from the world.

To benefit from the globalised economy, a country must participate in it by using its strengths to the fullest. The British economist David Ricardo proved this mathematically in his theory of comparative advantage in 1817 - more than 200 years ago. And this is what we have to do. That is, we must become Atma Shakti Nirbhar - an India that uses its strengths to participate fully in the global economy. We must become Atma Shakti Nirbhar Bharat - not simply 'Atma Nirbhar Bharat'.

05 August 2022

Have To Start Hating You

Fell in love with you
Wanted to marry you
But cannot marry you
Have to marry someone else

Have to start hating you
Have to get you out of my mind
Have to stop thinking about you
Have to fall out of love with you

Have to forget I loved you
Have to forget you even existed
Have to forget everything about you
Have to forget all my dreams with you

Have to fall in love with another girl
Somehow all over again
But every time I look at her face
I will only see your face

Realise how much I love you
Only when I can't get you
Earlier I couldn't see anything bad in you
Now I shouldn't see anything good in you

Everybody tells me
Listen to your head
And not to your heart
But my head and heart are one

Your face and your smile
Your voice and your laughter
Just fill my head completely
And simply refuse to leave me

My heart is yanked out of my chest
And been ripped into shreds
I have to somehow put it back in
And stitch my chest back together

My love for you then was deep
But my self-pity now is deeper
The only way to claw myself out of this cavern
Is to first reach its bottom

Have to start hating you . . .

This is what happens when a PhD student cannot do his thesis on his favourite subject - and has to do it on another subject.

31 July 2022

Economics: Microeconomics Vs Macroeconomics

MICROECONOMICS VS MACROECONOMICS

In the 1930s Great Depression, classical economics (today called 'microeconomics') failed because of a basic truth about the economic system: the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. In 1936, John Maynard Keynes wrote 'The General Theory Of Employment, Interest And Money' and invented a new way of looking at the economy (called 'macroeconomics') based on this basic truth. Macroeconomics was correct because it filled an important gap in economics: the gap between the whole and the sum of the parts. This point is important. That is, the purpose of macroeconomics is ONLY to fill this gap - ie, to explain those aspects of the (aggregate) economy that microeconomics cannot explain. The purpose of macroeconomics is NOT to explain ALL aspects of the (aggregate) economy - ie, macroeconomics is not a magic wand / silver bullet. The economy is fundamentally a bottom-up (not top-down) system - so microeconomics DOES explain most of the aspects of the economy.

This is a fundamental point in economics. It is the most fundamental point about the relationship between microeconomics and macroeconomics. But unfortunately no textbook says this clearly. Micro textbooks don't say this because they think that micro is anyway the 'real economics' - and assume that everybody also thinks like this. Macro textbooks don't say this because they do not want to highlight macro's deficiency. So there is a gap of silence between the two - which creates a gap in students' understanding. But understanding this point is essential to understanding economics.

Basic economics courses (BSc's first two years and MSc's first year) are structured like this:
1. Microeconomics - 50%
2. Macroeconomics - 50%
So everybody thinks:
Economics = 50% Microeconomics + 50% Macroeconomics
(See Figure 1)

Advanced economics courses (MSc's second year) consist of subjects like Trade Economics, Labour Economics, Industrial Economics, etc. But all these subjects are nothing but applied microeconomics. And the 'Microeconomics' subjects in the basic economics courses are actually microeconomic theory. So Figure 1 is wrong. And the correct equation of economics is:
Economics = 25% Microeconomic Theory + 25% Macroeconomics + 50% Applied Microeconomics
(See Figure 2)

So we must carry out two changes in our economics courses:
1. Rename the basic 'Microeconomics' subjects as 'Microeconomic Theory'
2. Explicitly identify the other subjects as 'Applied Microeconomics'
Then students will correctly understand the real structure of economics.

16 July 2022

Introvert, Extrovert, Generalist, Specialist

[I got this idea from FundraisingCoach.com]

Which is the best profession for us? The two most important factors are:
A. Our orientation towards people
B. Our orientation towards subjects

A. Our orientation towards people
There are two types of people based on this factor:
1. Introverts get their energy from themselves
2. Extroverts get their energy from other people

B. Our orientation towards subjects
There are two types of people based on this factor:
1. Generalists are interested in many subjects
2. Specialists are interested in only one subject

So considering these two factors together, there are totally 2 x 2 = 4 types of people:
1. Extrovert-Generalist
2. Introvert-Specialist
3. Extrovert-Specialist
4. Introvert-Generalist

The best professions for these people are:
1. Extrovert-Generalist - These people have a basic knowledge of many subjects and are good at working with people. So they make good managers.
2. Introvert-Specialist - These people have an in-depth knowledge of one subject and are good at working alone. So they make good researchers.
3. Extrovert-Specialist - These people have an in-depth knowledge of one subject and are good at working with people. So they make good experts.
4. Introvert-Generalist - These people do not have enough knowledge in any subject and are not good at working with people. So they are unemployable.

The rough percentages of these types of people are:
1. Extrovert-Generalist - 95%
2. Introvert-Specialist - 2%
3. Extrovert-Specialist - 2%
4. Introvert-Generalist - 1%

13 July 2022

Guru - The Giver Of Knowledge

GURU - THE GIVER OF KNOWLEDGE

Today is Guru Poornima - the day we worship our Gurus.

Who is a Guru? A teacher (shikshak) only gives information - but a Guru gives us knowledge. If we think knowledge is the same as information, we will never understand the meaning of Guru. Our ancestors understood the meaning of knowledge and its power - and hence the importance of Guru. So they built an education system (Guru Kula system) based on this understanding. That is why India was the greatest civilisation in the world for 4000 years.

The counter-part of Guru is shishya (disciple). A student (vidyarthi) only receives information; but a shishya discovers knowledge - with the blessings of his/her Guru. The requirement for a Guru is knowledge. Similarly the requirement for a shishya is faith - in his/her Guru. If our Guru tells us to walk through fire, we must do so. Not by thinking that we will get burnt - then it is not faith; it is slavery. Faith means knowing that we will be able to walk through the fire without getting burnt - because we have our Guru's blessings.

Today everybody says: "Now there are only teachers/shikshaks - and very few Gurus". True. But the other side of the coin is: Today there are only students - and very few shishyas. If we want to produce Gurus, first we must become shishyas. If we want Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, first we become Narendranath Datta. Only then we can become a nation of Swami Vivekanandas.

The 21st century is the knowledge century. So let us understand the meaning of knowledge and its power - and the importance of Guru. And let us remember the timeless wisdom of our ancestors:
guru brahma guru vishNu
guru devo maheshwara
guru sAkshAt parabrahma
tasmai shree gurave namah
 - Skanda Purana

03 July 2022

'The Changing World Order' - Ray Dalio (Review/Summary)

Review/Summary:

Ray Dalio is the 70th richest man in the world (worth $20 billion) and the founder of Bridgewater Associates - the biggest hedge fund in the world.

In his latest book 'The Changing World Order' (currently the #1 economics bestseller in America) he gives a model to explain the rise and fall of superpowers. According to him, there have been 3 superpowers (Holland, Britain, America) and now the 4th one (China) is rising. He says the rise and fall of superpowers is driven/caused by two major cycles: the economic cycle and the political cycle. He further divides the political cycle into two cycles: the internal political cycle and the external political cycle. And among these 3 cycles, the most important is the economic cycle. Dalio says the economic cycle is driven/caused by the debt/credit cycle. In fact, the book's cover has a diagram of the debt/credit theory of economic cycles. But this is a fringe theory in economics. So Dalio's model is based on a fringe theory - which puts a big question mark on his entire model. Interestingly, the book has been praised by many heavyweights like Bill Gates and Henry Kissinger - but by only one economist: Lawrence Summers. And coincidentally, Lawrence Summers is also the only major economist who supports the debt/credit theory of economic cycles.

Other criticisms:
# In a good detective novel, all the loose ends go on getting tied up and cleared away as we reach the end of the book. Dalio's book is the opposite - cracks start appearing in his model and go on adding up. So at the end, we have to take his model with a pinch of salt.
# Dalio's basic approach is to build a numerical model that takes the numeric values of various indicators and uses them to make predictions about the world. This is a very interesting exercise but the world is too complex a system to be modelled like this. What gets left out is much more (both in quality and quantity) than what can be captured in such a model.
# Dalio's model basically says that a country collapses as a superpower when its debt becomes too high. To prove his argument, he bombards us with a ton of graphs of very specialised economic indicators for the 4 superpowers - but the most important graphs are missing: the debt-to-GDP ratios.
# Throughout the book, Dalio keeps saying that America is declining because its debt is high and China is rising because its debt is low. But America's total debt (government + corporate + household) is 240% of its GDP and China's total debt is 250% of its GDP. At the end of the book, he says that he has constructed his own index to measure a country's debt burden. He should have revealed this in the beginning - when he describes his debt/credit theory of economic cycles.
# Dalio wrongly uses many basic economics terms. Example: 'Devaluation' means a country reducing the value of its currency against other currencies. But he uses the word to mean a currency losing its value against gold. This is nothing but an increase in the price of gold - which anyway happens due to inflation. So he keeps saying 'devaluation' when it is actually inflation.
# Dalio talks about the 'real economy' and the 'financial economy' - as if they are two systems, equal in size and importance. This is wrong - the financial system is nothing but a sub-system of the economic system.
# People who have studied economics can read this book to test their understanding of the subject. People who have not studied economics are better off reading a good economics textbook instead.
# The book has no index or bibliography.

However Dalio does get a couple of points right:
# Importance of education - Dalio identifies 8 factors that make a country a superpower: 1) Education 2) Technology 3) Competitiveness 4) Military 5) Trade 6) GDP 7) Financial centre 8) Reserve currency. These are in chronological cause-effect order: ie, 1 leads to 2, 2 leads to 3, and so on. That is - he (correctly) identifies education as the most fundamental factor that makes a country strong. This is especially relevant for India because our education system (especially our primary education system) is very weak.
# Importance of fiscal discipline - During normal times, a country can have a high debt/deficit and nothing will happen. But normal times do not last forever - sooner or later, a shock will come. In the last two years alone, the world has had two major shocks: Covid-19 and the Ukraine War. And when a shock comes, countries with a low debt/deficit survive but countries with a high debt/deficit collapse. Hence fiscal discipline (ie, a country spending less than what it earns) is of paramount importance.

02 July 2022

I Am Nupur Sharma

Today a friend warned me about my Facebook post saying #IsupportNupurSharma. Let us look at this whole situation:

1. Hinduism respects all religions. This is the most fundamental feature of Hinduism.
2. The practical consequence of the above point is: For Hindus, not offending others is more important than telling the truth. That is - Hindus do not tell the truth if it will offend others.
# Feature #1 is great. Feature #2 is bad - but it is also a fundamental characteristic of Hindus.
# Nupur Sharma only stated a fact. In fact, she just quoted from Islam's own scripture. But in doing so, she violated rule/feature #2 of Hindus. But she did so when she lost her temper because Islamic fundamentalists were continuously abusing Lord Shiva in that debate.
# She later apologised unconditionally for what she said. Her party also punished her by firing her from her job and suspending her from the party.
# So the matter must have ended there. But next Islamic fundamentalists started threatening to rape and kill her - and liberals were tacitly supporting these threats.
# A Hindu called Kanhaiya Lal posted in support of her - and two Islamic fundamentalists killed him.
# A Supreme Court Judge says Nupur Sharma is responsible for Kanhaiya Lal's murder.

What does all this mean? Cannot we live and speak freely in our own country? Should we live in fear that somebody will kill us just because we stated a fact - or supported someone who stated a fact? If so, then what is the point of being alive?

So I no longer 'support' Nupur Sharma - now I am Nupur Sharma.

#IamNupurSharma

05 June 2022

Adam Smith, 'Wealth Of Nations', Free-Market Capitalism

ADAM SMITH, 'WEALTH OF NATIONS', FREE-MARKET CAPITALISM

Today is the 299th birth anniversary of the greatest thinker of all time - Adam Smith.

In the 1700s the science of economics (ie, the scientific study of the economy) was not yet born. But there was no shortage of schools of thought on the economy. The most dominant school of thought was mercantilism - which had two main beliefs:
1. A country's wealth is its gold/silver.
2. Exports are good and imports are bad.

Adam Smith was a professor of philosophy at Glasgow University in Scotland. His logical mind realised that mercantilism was wrong.  So he decided to write a book to disprove mercantilism. The result was 'Wealth Of Nations' in 1776. In it, he logically proved that:
1. A country's wealth is its farms and factories.
2. Exports and imports are two sides of the same coin.
But 'Wealth Of Nations' did not stop there. It was much more ambitious in scope. It went on to logically prove that the best economic system is the free, natural, efficient economic system. Later this economic system would come to be called as 'capitalism'.

'Wealth Of Nations' soon became popular and brought an end to mercantilism. But its real mission was just about to begin. In 1848, a German philosopher called Karl Marx wrote a book called 'Communist Manifesto' in which he designed a government-controlled economic system called 'socialism'. Socialism soon became the official economic ideology of the Communists. In 1917, Communists seized power in Russia, turned it into 'Soviet Union' and imposed socialism. When World War 2 ended in 1945, Soviet Union got control over East Europe and imposed socialism there. In 1947, India became free and its first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru imposed socialism. In 1949, Communists seized power in China and imposed socialism. Half the world was under socialism.

Countries that were lucky to adopt capitalism (like East Asia and South East Asia) grew fast and lifted their people out of poverty. Countries that were unlucky to adopt socialism grew slowly and struggled to lift their people out of poverty. In 1978, China changed its economic system from socialism to capitalism. In 1991, Soviet Union collapsed and broke up into 15 countries - which adopted capitalism. East Europe became free and adopted capitalism. Also in 1991, India started changing its economic system from socialism to capitalism under Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao.

From 1917 to 1991, that is for three-quarters of a century, half of mankind fell under the evil of socialism - and remained in poverty. India is still fighting the war against the evil of socialism - and trying to come out of poverty. Adam Smith logically proved almost 250 years ago how the free, natural, efficient economic system (capitalism) is the best economic system. May his wisdom always be with us . . .

01 June 2022

Congress Mukt Bharat

Today is a historic day - it marks the Congress Party's longest time out of power at the Centre. The previous record was 1996-2004.

17 May 1996 to 21 May 2004 = 2,927 days
27 May 2014 to 1 June 2022 = 2,928 days

We have been a free country for 75 years. In that time, Congress Party has been out of power continuously at the Centre for a maximum of 8 years. Today that record is being broken.

One more step towards Congress Mukt Bharat . . .

15 May 2022

Inflation And The 2014 National Election

Q: Why was the Congress Party reduced to 45 seats in the 2014 national election?
A: Because inflation in the last two years of the UPA-2 government was almost 10%.

[Note: CPI inflation was measured only from 2012 onwards - till then only WPI inflation was measured]

In 2008, WPI inflation started increasing (due to high oil price). In 2009, it dropped due to the global recession caused by the 2008 American Financial Crisis (AFC). But the drop was temporary - it started increasing again and averaged 9.5% in 2010-2011. The RBI increased the repo rate gradually from 4.75% to 8.5% during this period. But throughout these two years, the repo rate remained below the WPI inflation - and hence the real interest rate remained negative during these two years. From 2012 onwards, we have the CPI inflation - which is a better measure of the inflation that people/consumers actually face (as compared to WPI which is faced by the firms/industries). CPI inflation started off in 2012 January at an already high value of 7.65% and went on to increase further. By the time the national election came in 2014 April, it averaged 9.7% over 27 months. This means a price increase of 23% in just over 2 years - which is massive. For the middle class, inflation is an irritation. For poor people (who are the majority in India) it is more than an irritation: those who eat 3 meals a day have to eat 2 meals a day and those who eat 2 meals a day have to eat 1 meal a day. Therefore poor people overwhelmingly voted against the Congress Party in the national election and reduced it to 45 seats.

Why was the RBI not more aggressive in increasing the repo rate to control inflation? Answer: In the context of the 2009 global recession, the UPA-2 government wanted to keep the Indian economy's growth rate high - which meant not increasing the interest rate too much.

Cut to today. WPI inflation increased rapidly in the first half of 2021 from 2.5% to 13%. Now it is at 14.5%. CPI inflation was below 6% (the upper limit of the RBI's target) till 2022 January. But as happened exactly 10 years ago, the high WPI has started pulling up the CPI. As a result, CPI inflation is now at 7.8%.

And what has been the RBI's response? While the WPI inflation averaged around 13% from mid-2021 onwards, it kept the repo rate at just 4%. This was to increase the growth rate of the Indian economy which was devastated by the Covid-19 crisis. Sounds familiar? Yes - this was exactly the thinking of the UPA-2 government in 2010-2011. And we know what happened next.

Moral of the story: If the Prime Minister wants the BJP to avoid the Congress Party's 2014 fate, he must tell the Finance Minister and the RBI Governor only one thing: "Screw growth - just focus on reducing inflation".

Addendum: Before 2012, CPI was measured only for industrial workers (CPI-IW). CPI-IW roughly follows CPI. The average CPI-IW inflation for the UPA-2 period was 10.3% - ie, a price increase of 60% over 5 years. It reached a peak of 16% in 2010 January. By the way:
1. Average CPI-IW inflation for the 5 years of UPA-1 was 6.1%.
2. Average CPI inflation for the 5 years of Modi-1 was 4.35%.



25 April 2022

Government Economic Policies: Good Vs Bad

Good vs bad economic policies:
Government Policies
BAD
GOOD
Role in economy
Own and run companies
(Socialism)
Make and enforce rules
(Capitalism)
Spend on
Subsidies
Loan waivers
Welfare schemes
(Populism)
Infrastructure
Education
Healthcare
(Development)
Trade policy
High import tax
(Anti-trade)
Low import tax
(Pro-trade)

27 February 2022

2008 American Financial Crisis (AFC) - 2

Today is the 15th anniversary of the beginning of the 2008 American Financial Crisis (AFC).

The seller of a product/service knows more about it than the buyer. This is called information asymmetry. Information asymmetry leads to the collapse of the market. So to protect buyers from information symmetry (and the market from collapse) government makes some rules and enforces them. This is called regulation. In the case of complex financial products/services, even the sellers (financial companies) do not know anything about them. This is not just information asymmetry - this is information black-hole. In the case of information black-hole, government regulation is absolutely essential.

From around 1980 onwards, America's financial industry started designing more and more complex financial products/services like CDS (Credit Default Swap) and CDO (Collateralised Debt Obligation). This required stricter government regulation. But exactly the opposite happened - in a wave of excessive de-regulation, government regulation went on decreasing. Example: The 1933 Glass-Steagall Act had built a wall between commercial banking and investment banking - in 1999, America withdrew this law. The result of all this excessive de-regulation was the 2008 American Financial Crisis.